Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39558995›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India2024

Description of Clinical Facial Analysis of Down Syndrome Patients Using Rhinobase Software: An Anthropometric Study.

Al Hafiz, Alvarino, Yanwirasti, Trimartani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Al HafizDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Andalas, Padang, Indonesia.ORCID 0000-0002-6289-2468
AlvarinoDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Andalas, Padang, Indonesia.ORCID 0000-0002-2876-9861
YanwirastiDepartment of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Andalas, Padang, Indonesia.ORCID 0000-0003-3918-3978
TrimartaniDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia.ORCID 0000-0002-2399-0583

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPatients with Down syndrome have distinctive facial characteristics. Physical abnormalities that have many similarities make people with Down syndrome very similar to each other. This study aimed to determine the clinical facial analysis of patients with Down syndrome using Rhinobase Software.

methodsA descriptive observational study was conducted on patients with Down syndrome aged 10-29 years who met the criteria. Data were obtained through history taking, general facial physical examination and ENT-HN examination. Facial analysis using Rhinobase software.

resultThe results obtained were analyzed using the SPSS program. The average age of the sample was 17.7 ± 4.8 years with 73% of the sample being male. In the vertical facial assessment, the proportion of LFH > UFH > MFH was obtained. In the horizontal face assessment, 96% of the samples have En-En < Al-Al ratios. The proportion of the lower face height of people with Down syndrome to the whole face is greater than the proportion of the upper and middle height of the face.

conclusionThe value of the intercanthal distance is greater than the mean ideal intercanthal distance, and the highest proportion was the intercanthal distance which was smaller than the width of the ala nasi.

Indexed as

Clinical Facial AnalysisDown’s SyndromeRhinobase Software

Identifiers

PMID39558995
PMCPMC11569097

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.