Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39558988›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India2024

Enhancing Tonsillectomy Recovery with AI: A Comparative Study on Postoperative Care Outcomes.

Sanjay Kumar, Anghusman Dutta, Manish Gupta, Ran Singh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Advances in Remote Monitoring Technology Applications in Anesthesia: A Narrative Review.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sanjay KumarDepartment of ENT, Command Hospital Airforce Bangalore, Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences, Bangalore, India.ORCID 0000-0002-9737-7327
Anghusman DuttaDepartment of ENT, Command Hospital Airforce Bangalore, Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences, Bangalore, India.
Manish GuptaDepartment of Anaesthesia, Command Hospital Airforce, Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences, Bangalore, India.
Ran SinghDepartment of Medicine, Army College of Medical Science, Delhi Cantt, Delhi, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Tonsillectomy is commonly associated with significant postoperative challenges such as pain management, complication monitoring, and patient recovery. Traditional care methods, while effective, often do not adequately address these issues, particularly in personalized care and remote monitoring. This study assesses the impact of Artificial Intelligence (AI)-assisted postoperative care on recovery outcomes in tonsillectomy patients compared to conventional care methods. Methods: Conducted at a tertiary care hospital's Otolaryngology Department from January to December 2023, this observational cohort study involved 100 elective tonsillectomy patients. Participants were divided into two cohorts: one receiving traditional care and the other AI-assisted care, which utilized machine learning for pain management, continuous symptom monitoring through wearable devices, and virtual assistance. Results: AI-assisted care significantly improved early postoperative pain management, reducing pain scores to 5.2 ± 1.1 from 6.5 ± 1.2 in traditional care ( Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12070-024-05103-x.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceHealthcare InnovationPatient SatisfactionPostoperative CareTonsillectomy

Identifiers

PMID39558988
PMCPMC11569305

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.