Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39558925›Full record

ArticleJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare2024

Precision Structuring of Free-Text Surgical Record for Enhanced Stroke Management: A Comparative Evaluation of Large Language Models.

Mengfei Wang, Jianyong Wei, Yao Zeng, Lisong Dai, Bicong Yan, Yueqi Zhu, Xiaoer Wei, Yidong Jin, Yuehua Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Mengfei WangSchool of Health Science and Engineering, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0009-0002-9474-3368
Jianyong WeiClinical Research Center, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Yao ZengShenyang University of Technology, Shenyang, Liaoning, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0009-0002-3182-6107
Lisong DaiInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Bicong YanInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Yueqi ZhuInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Xiaoer WeiInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Yidong JinSchool of Health Science and Engineering, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Yuehua LiInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Mechanical thrombectomy (MTB) is a critical procedure for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients. However, the free-text format of MTB surgical records limits the formulation of effective postoperative patient management and rehabilitation plans. This study compares the efficacy of large language models (LLMs) in structuring data from these free-text MTB surgical record. Methods: This retrospective study collected a total of 382 MTB surgical records from a tertiary hospital. An initial analysis of 30 surgical record from these records provided a guiding prompt for LLMs, focusing on basic and advanced characteristics, such as occlusion locations, thrombectomy maneuvers, reperfusion status, and intraoperative complications. Six LLMs-ChatGPT, GPT-4, GeminiPro, ChatGLM4, Spark3, and QwenMax-were assessed against data extracted by neuroradiologists and a junior physician for comparison. The all 382 surgical records were used to test the performance of LLMs. The performance of the LLMs was quantified using Accuracy, Sensitivity, Specificity, AUC, and MSE as an additional metric for advanced characteristics. Results: All LLMs showed high performance in characteristic extraction, achieving an average accuracy of 95.09 ± 4.98% across 48 items, and 78.05 ± 4.2% overall. GLM4 and GPT-4 were most accurate in advanced characteristics extraction, with accuracies of 84.03% and 82.20%, respectively. The processing time for LLMs averaged 73.10 ± 10.86 seconds of six models, significantly faster than the 427.88 seconds for manual extraction by physicians. Conclusion: LLMs, particularly GLM4 and GPT-4, efficiently and accurately structured both general and advanced characteristics from MTB surgical record, outperforming manual extraction methods and demonstrating potential for enhancing clinical data management in AIS treatment.

Indexed as

acute ischemia strokefree-text reportlarge language modelsmechanical thrombectomy

Identifiers

PMID39558925
PMCPMC11572044

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.