ArticleAsian journal of andrology2025
Genitourethral foreign bodies: 20-year experience and outcomes from a single center.
Article in Asian journal of andrology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Migration of a urethral foreign body into the scrotum in an adolescent: a case report.BMC urology · 2025Article
- Urethral foreign body insertion for symptom relief: a case report.Journal of medical case reports · 2025Article
- Urethral self-insertion of foreign body; a peculiar doorway to a psychiatric diagnosis: a case report.BMC urology · 2025Article
- Self-Inflicted Urethrovesical Foreign Body in a 57-Year-Old Male Causing a Urethrocutaneous Fistula: A Case Report.Clinical case reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
abstractThe presentation of a foreign body in the lower urinary tract is a challenging urological emergency with highly variable management approaches. A retrospective cohort study was undertaken to identify the patients who presented with self-inserted genitourethral foreign body to adult tertiary centers within our local health network (Southern Adelaide Local Health Network, Adelaide, Australia) from October 2002 to October 2022. Patient demographics, type of foreign body, psychiatric comorbidities, retrieval techniques, complications, and readmission data were extracted. Twenty-seven cases were identified with a median age of 44 years. Twenty-three (85.2%) were male and 4 (14.8%) were female. Ten patients (37.0%) had a concurrent psychiatric illness. The most commonly inserted foreign bodies were plastic tubes/wires (29.6%). Twenty cases (74.1%) were retrieved endoscopically. Three patients (11.1%) required open cystotomy and one underwent a transperineal urethrotomy. Four patients (14.8%) represented after discharge. Two patients had repeat presentations for genitourinary foreign body insertion. A significant monotonic positive trend of foreign body presentations was identified (Mann-Kendall tau = 0.95, P = 0.043). Presentations of genitourethral foreign body insertions have trended upward over the past two decades. However, most cases were successfully managed endoscopically.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.