ReviewNeurourology and urodynamics2025
What Is Needed to Determine and Potentially Improve the Clinical Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of Robot-Assisted Reconstructive Urinary Tract and Pelvic Floor Surgery?-ICI-RS 2024.
Review in Neurourology and urodynamics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionRobot-assisted (RA) surgery has many advantages for urinary tract and pelvic floor reconstruction (UTPFR) but its application is only slowly increasing. Studies are limited in number, patients and follow-up duration. The low-volume high-complexity nature of UTPFR warrants specific research to evaluate the potential role of the RA approach.
methodsDuring its 2024 meeting in Bristol, the International Consultation on Incontinence-Research Society (ICI-RS) reviewed the current literature on RA UTPFR. Priority research questions and strategies were explored in a proposal.
resultsFour different topics were discussed. (1) Large multicentre prospective studies on RA UTPFR are needed to evaluate clinical effectiveness and safety. The RA approach needs to be prioritized in specific procedures and patients, to first improve patient care where gains are highest. (2) Models for cost-utility analysis for RA UTPFR are needed to (re)direct limited resources as efficiently as possible in a quickly changing technological field. (3) A modular curriculum for training UTPFR surgeons to become RA certified needs to be developed, to allow valid interpretation and comparison of outcomes. (4) Technological improvements to address tissue handling, accessibility, efficiency and sustainability are needed. Digitalization can be a gamechanger for RA UTPFR through telesurgery (training and expertize coverage), augmented reality and artificial intelligence providing intra-operative assistance, assessment and feedback.
conclusionsThe proposal discussed the need for studies on clinical and cost effectiveness, safety, and training curriculum development for RA UTPFR. Recent technological developments hold great promise for RA UTPFR. High-priority research questions were identified.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.