Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39558692›Full record

Trial reportDiseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus2025

Central ligation or partial preservation of the right gastric artery does not seem to affect conduit or anastomotic perfusion during robot-assisted resection of gastroesophageal junction cancer: a randomized clinical trial.

Jens Thomas Fredrik Osterkamp, Nikolaj Nerup, Morten Bo S Svendsen, Rune B Strandby, Lars Bo Svendsen, Eske K Aasvang, Henrik Vad, Astrid Plamboeck, Michael P Achiam

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jens Thomas Fredrik OsterkampDepartment of Transplantation and Digestive Diseases, Centre for Cancer and Organ Diseases, Rigshospitalet, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-6329-2707
Nikolaj NerupDepartment of Transplantation and Digestive Diseases, Centre for Cancer and Organ Diseases, Rigshospitalet, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Morten Bo S SvendsenCopenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation (CAMES), Rigshospitalet, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Rune B StrandbyDepartment of Transplantation and Digestive Diseases, Centre for Cancer and Organ Diseases, Rigshospitalet, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Lars Bo SvendsenDepartment of Transplantation and Digestive Diseases, Centre for Cancer and Organ Diseases, Rigshospitalet, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Eske K AasvangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Centre for Cancer and Organ Diseases, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Henrik VadDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Centre for Cancer and Organ Diseases, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Astrid PlamboeckDepartment of Anesthesiology, Centre for Cancer and Organ Diseases, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Michael P AchiamDepartment of Transplantation and Digestive Diseases, Centre for Cancer and Organ Diseases, Rigshospitalet, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Funding

Aase og Ejnar Danielsens FondFabrikant Einar Willumsens MindelegatGrosserer L.F. Foghts FondMedtronic plc
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The gastric conduit can be created with partial preservation or a central ligation of the right gastric artery. Central ligation may facilitate complete removal of lymph node (LN) station 3; however, whether this influences conduit and anastomotic perfusion is unknown. Hence this study investigated whether a central ligation of the right gastric artery would affect conduit or anastomotic perfusion compared with partial preservation (local standard) during robot-assisted resection of gastroesophageal junction cancer. Patients scheduled for robot-assisted resection of gastroesophageal junction cancer were randomized to either central ligation or partial preservation of the right gastric artery. Perfusion was assessed using quantified indocyanine green angiography: before gastric mobilization, after conduit formation, and after anastomosis. Hemodynamic variables during surgery and surgical outcomes were recorded. We included 70 patients between June 2020 and October 2021, of whom 5 were excluded from the final analysis. The two patient groups did not differ in conduit (0.07 [interquartile range (IQR), 0.05-0.08] vs. 0.07 u [IQR, 0.05-0.08], P = 0.86) or anastomotic perfusion (0.08 [standard deviation (SD), ±0.02] vs. 0.08 u [SD, ±0.02], P = 0.21), nor did they differ in intraoperative blood loss, anastomotic leaks, postoperative complications, or 1-year survival. However, more LNs were resected in the central ligation group (36 [IQR, 30-44] vs. 28 [IQR, 23-43], P = 0.02). Introducing a central ligation of the right gastric artery did not seem to affect conduit or anastomotic perfusion, compared with partial preservation. However, significantly more LNs were resected.

Indexed as

Anastomosis, SurgicalEsophageal NeoplasmsEsophagectomyEsophagogastric JunctionGastric ArteryRobotic Surgical ProceduresAgedFemaleHumansLigationLymph Node ExcisionMaleMiddle AgedStomachStomach NeoplasmsTreatment Outcomegastricgastroesophageal junction tumorsrobotic surgerysurgical gastroenterology

Identifiers

PMID39558692

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.