ArticleJournal of chemical information and modeling2024
Benchmarking Cross-Docking Strategies in Kinase Drug Discovery.
Article in Journal of chemical information and modeling, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Benchmarking Docking Protocols on Predicting Alternative Binding Modes.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2026Article
- Reproducibility, validation, and failure modes across classical and AI-driven molecular docking.Journal of computer-aided molecular design · 2026Review
- How many crystal structures do you need to trust your docking results?bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Lessons learned during the journey of data: from experiment to model for predicting kinase affinity, selectivity, polypharmacology, and resistance.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In recent years, machine learning has transformed many aspects of the drug discovery process, including small molecule design, for which the prediction of bioactivity is an integral part. Leveraging structural information about the interactions between a small molecule and its protein target has great potential for downstream machine learning scoring approaches but is fundamentally limited by the accuracy with which protein-ligand complex structures can be predicted in a reliable and automated fashion. With the goal of finding practical approaches to generating useful kinase-inhibitor complex geometries for downstream machine learning scoring approaches, we present a kinase-centric docking benchmark assessing the performance of different classes of docking and pose selection strategies to assess how well experimentally observed binding modes are recapitulated in a realistic cross-docking scenario. The assembled benchmark data set focuses on the well-studied protein kinase family and comprises a subset of 589 protein structures cocrystallized with 423 ATP-competitive ligands. We find that the docking methods biased by the cocrystallized ligand, utilizing shape overlap with or without maximum common substructure matching, are more successful in recovering binding poses than standard physics-based docking alone. Also, docking into multiple structures significantly increases the chance of generating a low root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) docking pose. Docking utilizing an approach that combines all three methods (Posit) into structures with the most similar cocrystallized ligands according to the maximum common substructure (MCS) proved to be the most efficient way to reproduce binding poses, achieving a success rate of 70.4% across all included systems. The studied docking and pose selection strategies, which utilize the OpenEye Toolkits, were implemented into pipelines of the KinoML framework, allowing automated and reliable protein-ligand complex generation for future downstream machine learning tasks. Although focused on protein kinases, we believe that the general findings can also be transferred to other protein families.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.