ArticleAnnals of transplantation2024
Ten-Year Retrospective Analysis of Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy in Burn Patients: Impact on Survival and Timing of Initiation.
Article in Annals of transplantation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- An Epidemiological Survey of Fluid Resuscitation Practices for Adult Burns Patients in the United Kingdom.European burn journal · 2025Article
- Infections and mortality in ICU patients undergoing continuous renal replacement therapy: a retrospective cohort study.BMC nephrology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common issue in intensive care units and is a potentially lethal consequence of severe burns. In severely burned patients with non-renal indications, renal replacement treatment is frequently used. This study's aim was to compile a 10-year summary of continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) experience at a single burn center, including patient outcomes, effectiveness, and potential complications in the context of severe burns. MATERIAL AND METHODS This retrospective analysis included the clinical data from 723 burned patients. The data analysis of 300 patients with CRRT therapy included clinical data, laboratory tests, and CRRT parameters. The study group was split into 2 subgroups regarding onset of CRRT: early (up to 7 days after the trauma) and late. RESULTS Age, burn extent, length of stay, and inhalation injury all had an impact on survival. Early CRRT was linked to a greater probability of death (P<0.005). Upon admission to the burn center, patients with early CRRT exhibited a bigger burn area, higher Baux and SOFA scores, and were younger (P<0.05). Sepsis was diagnosed more frequently in the late CRRT group. CONCLUSIONS Our findings show that patients who require CRRT within the first 7 days following a burn injury have a poorer prognosis; however, this is not due to CRRT's effect, but rather to the trauma's severity. Future studies should explore long-term patient outcomes of CRRT among burn patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.