ArticleJournal of phycology2025
Oxygen and pH fluxes in shallow bay habitats: Evaluating the effectiveness of a macroalgal forest restoration.
Article in Journal of phycology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Oxygen and pH fluxes in shallow bay habitats: Evaluating the effectiveness of a macroalgal forest restoration.Journal of phycology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Marine macroalgae are important primary producers in coastal ecosystems. Within sheltered and shallow bays in the Mediterranean, various Fucalean macroalgae and seagrasses coexist, creating habitats of high ecological importance. These habitats have historically suffered from various disturbances, and on this basis, active restoration actions have been proposed as potential solutions for their recovery. Here, we assessed the restoration success of a 10-year restored macroalgal forest by evaluating the recovery in terms of oxygen and pH fluxes and comparing those data with those of a healthy marine forest and a degraded habitat counterpart. We estimated the overall changes in dissolved oxygen and pH using light and dark community in situ incubations. We also determined the biomass and composition of macroalgal and macroinvertebrate compartments of each assemblage. During light incubations, the healthy and restored forest assemblages showed similar average net oxygen production, 5.7 times higher than in the degraded one, and a greater increase in pH. More than 95% of the incubated biomass corresponded to macroalgal and seagrass species. The restored forest showed a six-fold increase in biomass, most likely being responsible for the recovery of primary production. This work provides empirical evidence that the restoration of a single structural species, once successful in the early stages, can yield positive results by recovering processes such as primary production and dark respiration. Moreover, these results showcase differences in ecosystem functions between healthy (either mature or restored) and degraded habitats, highlighting the importance of protecting and preserving coastal marine forests.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.