Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39558537›Full record

ArticleJournal of phycology2025

Oxygen and pH fluxes in shallow bay habitats: Evaluating the effectiveness of a macroalgal forest restoration.

Cristina Galobart, Cèlia Sitjà, Sònia de Caralt, Jorge Santamaría, Alba Vergés, Jordi Boada, Emma Cebrian

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of phycology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Cristina GalobartCentre d'Estudis Avançats de Blanes (CEAB-CSIC), Blanes, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-3179-6203
Cèlia SitjàCentre d'Estudis Avançats de Blanes (CEAB-CSIC), Blanes, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-0736-9583
Sònia de CaraltInstitut d'Ecologia Aquàtica (IEA), Universitat de Girona (UdG), Girona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-3522-4798
Jorge SantamaríaCentre d'Estudis Avançats de Blanes (CEAB-CSIC), Blanes, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-4425-6297
Alba VergésInstitut d'Ecologia Aquàtica (IEA), Universitat de Girona (UdG), Girona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-1667-8663
Jordi BoadaCentre d'Estudis Avançats de Blanes (CEAB-CSIC), Blanes, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-3815-625X
Emma CebrianCentre d'Estudis Avançats de Blanes (CEAB-CSIC), Blanes, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-7588-0135

Funding

European Biodiversity Partnership under the 2021-2022 BiodivProtect joint call, co-funded by the European Commission (GA N°101052342) and with the funding organisations, Agencia Estatal de Investigación AEI/10.13039/501100011033/NextGenerationEU/PRTR (FoRescue) PCI2022-135052-2European Biodiversity Partnership under the 2021-2022 BiodivProtect joint call, co-funded by the European Commission (GA N°101052342) and with the funding organisations, Agencia Estatal de Investigación AEI/10.13039/501100011033/NextGenerationEU/PRTR (FoRescue) PCI2022-135070-2European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program (FuturMARES) Nº 869300Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation under the grant FORESTA, funded by MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 (European Union) N° PID2020-112985GB-I00The European Union - NextGeneration EU - as part of the MITECO program for the Spanish Recovery, Transformation and Resilience Plan (Recovery and Resilience Facility of the European Union established by the Regulation (EU) 2020/2094), and was entrusted to CSIC, AZTI, SOCIB, and the Universities of Vigo and Cadiz
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Marine macroalgae are important primary producers in coastal ecosystems. Within sheltered and shallow bays in the Mediterranean, various Fucalean macroalgae and seagrasses coexist, creating habitats of high ecological importance. These habitats have historically suffered from various disturbances, and on this basis, active restoration actions have been proposed as potential solutions for their recovery. Here, we assessed the restoration success of a 10-year restored macroalgal forest by evaluating the recovery in terms of oxygen and pH fluxes and comparing those data with those of a healthy marine forest and a degraded habitat counterpart. We estimated the overall changes in dissolved oxygen and pH using light and dark community in situ incubations. We also determined the biomass and composition of macroalgal and macroinvertebrate compartments of each assemblage. During light incubations, the healthy and restored forest assemblages showed similar average net oxygen production, 5.7 times higher than in the degraded one, and a greater increase in pH. More than 95% of the incubated biomass corresponded to macroalgal and seagrass species. The restored forest showed a six-fold increase in biomass, most likely being responsible for the recovery of primary production. This work provides empirical evidence that the restoration of a single structural species, once successful in the early stages, can yield positive results by recovering processes such as primary production and dark respiration. Moreover, these results showcase differences in ecosystem functions between healthy (either mature or restored) and degraded habitats, highlighting the importance of protecting and preserving coastal marine forests.

Indexed as

EcosystemEnvironmental Restoration and RemediationOxygenSeaweedBaysBiomassHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationInvertebratesOxygenecosystem functioningin situ benthic incubationsmacroalgal primary productionrestoration successshallow marine forests

Identifiers

PMID39558537
PMCPMC11914953

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.