Trial reportClinical and translational science2024
High-dose intranasal insulin in an adaptive dose-escalation study in healthy human participants.
Trial report in Clinical and translational science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- High-dose intranasal insulin in an adaptive dose-escalation study in healthy human participants.Clinical and translational science · 2024Trial
- Narrative review of rationale for IV deferoxamine plus intranasal insulin to ameliorate brain damage following resuscitation from cardiac arrest.Resuscitation plus · 2026Review
- Effect of preoperative intranasal insulin on postoperative delirium in adult surgical patients: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and trial sequential analysis.Perioperative medicine (London, England) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intranasal insulin is a putative neuroprotective therapy after cardiac arrest, but safety in humans at doses extrapolated from animal models is unknown. This phase I, open-label adaptive dose-escalation study explores the maximum tolerated dose of intranasal insulin in healthy human participants. Placebo or insulin at doses from 0 to 1000 units was given to healthy participants intranasally on repeated weekly visits. Serum glucose, insulin, and C-peptide levels were measured serially at 0, 15, 30, 60, 120, 180, and 240 min after administration. Twenty-four participants (12 female, median age 53, IQR 35-61) were enrolled. There was minimal change in average serum glucose after administration of intranasal insulin. Average serum insulin increased slightly in a dose-dependent manner, reaching maximum concentrations at 15 min. C-peptide decreased over time from administration in all groups. One participant had severe hypoglycemia (24 mg/dL at 45 min) and a different participant had mild hypoglycemia (51 mg/dL at 30 min), both after receiving 600 U intranasal insulin. Hypoglycemic episodes were associated with increases in serum insulin. Both participants continued in the study without hypoglycemia after additional doses. High-dose intranasal insulin up to 1000 U was generally well tolerated, with minimal measurable systemic absorption and without significant aggregate changes in mean glucose. Idiosyncratic episodic systemic absorption and hypoglycemia require further study and additional caution in potential clinical application. Further study of its target engagement and efficacy as a neuroprotective therapy after cardiac arrest at these doses is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.