Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39558506›Full record

Trial reportClinical and translational science2024

High-dose intranasal insulin in an adaptive dose-escalation study in healthy human participants.

Florian Schmitzberger, Jennifer Fowler, Cindy H Hsu, Manjunath P Pai, Robert W Neumar, William J Meurer, Robert Silbergleit

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical and translational science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Florian SchmitzbergerDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9314-4868
Jennifer FowlerDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.ORCID 0009-0008-2129-4024
Cindy H HsuDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8192-6969
Manjunath P PaiMax Harry Weil Institute for Critical Care Research and Innovation, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7119-5034
Robert W NeumarDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7942-8496
William J MeurerDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1158-5302
Robert SilbergleitDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4101-2430

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intranasal insulin is a putative neuroprotective therapy after cardiac arrest, but safety in humans at doses extrapolated from animal models is unknown. This phase I, open-label adaptive dose-escalation study explores the maximum tolerated dose of intranasal insulin in healthy human participants. Placebo or insulin at doses from 0 to 1000 units was given to healthy participants intranasally on repeated weekly visits. Serum glucose, insulin, and C-peptide levels were measured serially at 0, 15, 30, 60, 120, 180, and 240 min after administration. Twenty-four participants (12 female, median age 53, IQR 35-61) were enrolled. There was minimal change in average serum glucose after administration of intranasal insulin. Average serum insulin increased slightly in a dose-dependent manner, reaching maximum concentrations at 15 min. C-peptide decreased over time from administration in all groups. One participant had severe hypoglycemia (24 mg/dL at 45 min) and a different participant had mild hypoglycemia (51 mg/dL at 30 min), both after receiving 600 U intranasal insulin. Hypoglycemic episodes were associated with increases in serum insulin. Both participants continued in the study without hypoglycemia after additional doses. High-dose intranasal insulin up to 1000 U was generally well tolerated, with minimal measurable systemic absorption and without significant aggregate changes in mean glucose. Idiosyncratic episodic systemic absorption and hypoglycemia require further study and additional caution in potential clinical application. Further study of its target engagement and efficacy as a neuroprotective therapy after cardiac arrest at these doses is warranted.

Indexed as

Administration, IntranasalBlood GlucoseDose-Response Relationship, DrugHealthy VolunteersInsulinAdultC-PeptideFemaleHumansHypoglycemiaHypoglycemic AgentsMaleMaximum Tolerated DoseMiddle AgedBlood GlucoseC-PeptideHypoglycemic AgentsInsulin

Identifiers

PMID39558506
PMCPMC11573730

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.