Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39558437›Full record

ArticleJournal of pharmaceutical health care and sciences2024

Efficacy of a melatonin receptor agonist and orexin receptor antagonists in preventing delirium symptoms in the olderly patients with stroke: a retrospective study.

Yukiko Miyoshi, Yuki Shigetsura, Daiki Hira, Takakuni Maki, Hirotsugu Kawashima, Naoko Sugita, Noriko Sugawara, Noriaki Kitada, Machiko Hirai, Masayoshi Kawata and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pharmaceutical health care and sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Prevention and Treatment of ICU Delirium in Brain Injured Patients.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Yukiko MiyoshiDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Kyoto University Hospital, 54 Shogoin- Kawahara-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan.
Yuki ShigetsuraDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Kyoto University Hospital, 54 Shogoin- Kawahara-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan. sigetura@kuhp.kyoto-u.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7033-5357
Daiki HiraDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Kyoto University Hospital, 54 Shogoin- Kawahara-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan.
Takakuni MakiDepartment of Neurology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, 54 Shogoin- Kawahara-Cho, Sakyo-Ku, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan.
Hirotsugu KawashimaDepartment of Psychiatry, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, 54 Shogoin- Kawahara-Cho, Sakyo-Ku, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan.
Naoko SugitaDepartment of Psychiatry, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, 54 Shogoin- Kawahara-Cho, Sakyo-Ku, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan.
Noriko SugawaraDepartment of Nursing, Kyoto University Hospital, 54 Shogoin-Kawahara-Cho, Sakyo-Ku, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan.
Noriaki KitadaDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Kyoto University Hospital, 54 Shogoin- Kawahara-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan.
Machiko HiraiDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Kyoto University Hospital, 54 Shogoin- Kawahara-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan.
Masayoshi KawataDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Kyoto University Hospital, 54 Shogoin- Kawahara-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan.
Hiroki EndoDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Kyoto University Hospital, 54 Shogoin- Kawahara-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan.
Yusuke KojimaDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Kyoto University Hospital, 54 Shogoin- Kawahara-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan.
Keiko IkutaDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Kyoto University Hospital, 54 Shogoin- Kawahara-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan.
Yurie KatsubeDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Kyoto University Hospital, 54 Shogoin- Kawahara-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan.
Natsuki ImayoshiDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Kyoto University Hospital, 54 Shogoin- Kawahara-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan.
Shunsaku NakagawaDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Kyoto University Hospital, 54 Shogoin- Kawahara-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan.
Masahiro TsudaDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Kyoto University Hospital, 54 Shogoin- Kawahara-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan.
Tomohiro TeradaDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Kyoto University Hospital, 54 Shogoin- Kawahara-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPost-stroke delirium affects between 24% and 43% of patients, and negatively impacts patient outcomes. Recently, research attention has been on preventive interventions for delirium, with melatonin receptor agonists and orexin receptor antagonists reported to be effective in preventing delirium in intensive care unit patients. However, the efficacy of these agents in preventing post-stroke delirium remain unclear. This study examined the efficacy of ramelteon, suvorexant, and lemborexant in preventing post-stroke delirium symptoms in patients with stroke.

methodsA retrospective survey of medical records was conducted for patients with stroke aged > 75 years at Kyoto University Hospital from October 2021 to March 2023. Patients who received ramelteon, suvorexant, or lemborexant on admission and the following day were classified into the consecutive administration group, whereas those who did not were classified into the non-consecutive administration group. The primary outcome was an increase in the number of positive items in the delirium screening tool over 7 days.

resultsOf the 104 patients, 33 and 71 were in the consecutive and non-consecutive administration groups, respectively. Fewer patients in the consecutive administration group had an increase in the number of positive items than in the other group (6% vs. 21%). Patients in the consecutive administration group significantly less often had an increase in the number of positive items in the delirium screening tool (P = 0.05; hazard ratio, 0.27; 95% confidence interval, 0.10-0.75).

conclusionsThis study revealed that early administration of a melatonin receptor agonist or orexin receptor antagonists may effectively prevent post-stroke delirium in older patients.

Indexed as

DeliriumMelatonin receptor agonistOrexin receptor antagonistStroke

Identifiers

PMID39558437
PMCPMC11572110

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.