Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39558435›Full record

ReviewMovement ecology2024

Identifying signals of memory from observations of animal movements.

Dongmin Kim, Peter R Thompson, David W Wolfson, Jerod A Merkle, L G R Oliveira-Santos, James D Forester, Tal Avgar, Mark A Lewis, John Fieberg

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Movement ecology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Dongmin KimDepartment of Ecology, Evolution and Behavior, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, USA. kimx3725@umn.edu.
Peter R ThompsonSchool of Environmental Science, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada.
David W WolfsonDepartment of Fisheries, Wildlife and Conservation Biology, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, USA.
Jerod A MerkleDepartment of Zoology and Physiology, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY, USA.
L G R Oliveira-SantosDepartmento de Ecologia, Universidade Federal do Mato Grosso do Sul, Campo Grande, Brazil.
James D ForesterDepartment of Fisheries, Wildlife and Conservation Biology, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, USA.
Tal AvgarDepartment of Biology, University of British Columbia-Okanagan and Wildlife Science Centre, Biodiversity Pathways Ltd, Kelowna, BC, Canada.
Mark A LewisDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics and Department of Biology, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada.
John FiebergDepartment of Fisheries, Wildlife and Conservation Biology, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, USA.

Funding

National Science Foundation INTERN award 1654609the National Aeronautics and Space Administration award 80NSSC21K1182
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Incorporating memory (i.e., some notion of familiarity or experience with the landscape) into models of animal movement is a rising challenge in the field of movement ecology. The recent proliferation of new methods offers new opportunities to understand how memory influences movement. However, there are no clear guidelines for practitioners wishing to parameterize the effects of memory on moving animals. We review approaches for incorporating memory into step-selection analyses (SSAs), a frequently used movement modeling framework. Memory-informed SSAs can be constructed by including spatial-temporal covariates (or maps) that define some aspect of familiarity (e.g., whether, how often, or how long ago the animal visited different spatial locations) derived from long-term telemetry data. We demonstrate how various familiarity covariates can be included in SSAs using a series of coded examples in which we fit models to wildlife tracking data from a wide range of taxa. We discuss how these different approaches can be used to address questions related to whether and how animals use information from past experiences to inform their future movements. We also highlight challenges and decisions that the user must make when applying these methods to their tracking data. By reviewing different approaches and providing code templates for their implementation, we hope to inspire practitioners to investigate further the importance of memory in animal movements using wildlife tracking data.

Indexed as

Animal movementCognitive mapFamiliarityMemoryOccurrence distributionSpace useStep-selection analysesWildlife tracking data

Identifiers

PMID39558435
PMCPMC11575436

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.