ArticleJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2024
Combining OSTA and BMR to predict osteoporosis in Chinese population.
Article in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionOsteoporosis is a debilitating bone disease that significantly contributes to disability and a loss of autonomy among older adults. This study aimed to characterize osteoporosis and explore the feasibility of combining OSTA and BMR for osteoporosis prediction.
methodsA cross-sectional study involving 1435 participants (1300 women and 135 men) was conducted. Spearman's correlation, simple linear regression analyses, and multiple linear regression models were utilized to investigate the association between OSTA, BMR, and bone mineral density (BMD). Furthermore, the efficacy of integrating OSTA with BMR for osteoporosis screening and prediction was assessed through receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.
resultsIn the total population, the sensitivity of combination variable W was 58.63%, and the specificity was 70.90%. When OSTA and BMR were employed separately to diagnose osteoporosis, the sensitivity was 47.70% and 55.34%, respectively, while the specificity was 63.80% and 69.80%, respectively.
conclusionsThe combined utilization of OSTA and BMR formula represents an effective screening method for osteoporosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.