Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39558401›Full record

ReviewCancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society2024

Seeing through "brain fog": neuroimaging assessment and imaging biomarkers for cancer-related cognitive impairments.

Quanquan Gu, Liya Wang, Tricia Z King, Hongbo Chen, Longjiang Zhang, Jianming Ni, Hui Mao

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Cognitive training for breast cancer patients with cancer-related cognitive impairment: a scoping review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Quanquan GuDepartment of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, 1750 Haygood Drive NE, Atlanta, Georgia, 30322, USA.
Liya WangDepartment of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, 1750 Haygood Drive NE, Atlanta, Georgia, 30322, USA.
Tricia Z KingSchool of Nursing, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, 30322, USA.
Hongbo ChenSchool of Life and Environmental Sciences, Guilin University of Electronic Technology, Guilin, 541004, Guangxi, People's Republic of China.
Longjiang ZhangDepartment of Radiology, Jinling Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, Nanjing, 210002, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China.
Jianming NiWuxi Second Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University, Wuxi, 214042, People's Republic of China.
Hui MaoDepartment of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, 1750 Haygood Drive NE, Atlanta, Georgia, 30322, USA. hmao@emory.edu.

Funding

MR Investigation of IDH Mutation and Its Marker 2-HG in Brain Tumor PatientsR01CA169937 · NCI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI MAO, HUI · 2013 to 2017
$1.9M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA169937NIH HHS R01CA169937
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advances in cancer diagnosis and treatment have substantially improved patient outcomes and survival in recent years. However, up to 75% of cancer patients and survivors, including those with non-central nervous system (non-CNS) cancers, suffer from "brain fog" or impairments in cognitive functions such as attention, memory, learning, and decision-making. While we recognize the impact of cancer-related cognitive impairment (CRCI), we have not fully investigated and understood the causes, mechanisms and interplays of various involving factors. Consequently, there are unmet needs in clinical oncology in assessing the risk of CRCI and managing patients and survivors with this condition in order to make informed treatment decisions and ensure the quality of life for cancer survivors. The state-of-the-art neuroimaging technologies, particularly clinical imaging modalities like magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and positron emission tomography (PET), have been widely used to study neuroscience questions, including CRCI. However, in-depth applications of these functional and molecular imaging methods in CRCI and their clinical implementation for CRCI management are largely limited. This scoping review provides the current understanding of contributing neurological factors to CRCI and applications of the state-of-the-art multi-modal neuroimaging methods in investigating the functional and structural alterations related to CRCI. Findings from these studies and potential imaging-biomarkers of CRCI that can be used to improve the assessment and characterization of CRCI as well as to predict the risk of CRCI are also highlighted. Emerging issues and perspectives on future development and applications of neuroimaging tools to better understand CRCI and incorporate neuroimaging-based approaches to treatment decisions and patient management are discussed.

Indexed as

Cognitive DysfunctionNeoplasmsNeuroimagingBiomarkersBrainHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingPositron-Emission TomographyBiomarkersBrain functionsCancer survivorsChemotherapyCognitive impairmentMagnetic resonance imagingNeuroimagingPositron-Emission TomographyRadiation

Identifiers

PMID39558401
PMCPMC11572057

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.