SynthesisEuropean journal of medical research2024
Artificial intelligence in cytopathological applications for cancer: a review of accuracy and analytic validity.
Synthesis in European journal of medical research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Artificial intelligence for lung cancer classification in cytology specimens: A systematic review and diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis of benign-malignant diagnosis and ADC/SCC/SCLC subtyping.Journal of pathology informatics · 2026Review
- Pathology Foundation Models: Evolution, Current Landscape, Challenges and Opportunities from a Technical and Clinical Perspective.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Development of an artificial intelligence-based computer-aided detection system for routine gastric biopsy diagnosis.Journal of pathology informatics · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence for colposcopic and cytological image analysis in early cervical cancer detection.iScience · 2026Review
- Machine learning-based classification of papillary thyroid carcinoma versus multinodular goiter using preoperative laboratory and cytology data.BMC endocrine disorders · 2026Article
- Estimating Tumor Proportion in Smear Slides for Reliable Molecular Analysis.Turk patoloji dergisi · 2026Article
- Taiwan's Smart Healthcare Value Chain: AI Innovation from R&D to Industry Deployment.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- A quantitative study of pathologists' perceptions towards artificial intelligence-assisted diagnostic system.PLOS digital health · 2025Article
- Review
- AI in Cervical Cancer Cytology Diagnostics: A Narrative Review of Cutting-Edge Studies.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Advancements in Digital Cytopathology Since COVID-19: Insights from a Narrative Review of Review Articles.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Liquid-based cytology in the era of multi-omics and artificial intelligence integration.CytoJournal · 2025Article
- Hybrid feature fusion in cervical cancer cytology: a novel dual-module approach framework for lesion detection and classification using radiomics, deep learning, and reproducibility.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Cytopathology 2.0: How Artificial Intelligence Is Redefining the Future of Cytopathology.Journal of cytologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCytopathological examination serves as a tool for diagnosing solid tumors and hematologic malignancies. Artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted methods have been widely discussed in the literature for increasing sensitivity, specificity and accuracy in the diagnosis of cytopathological clinical samples. Many of these tools are also used in clinical practice. There is a growing body of literature describing the role of AI in clinical settings, particularly in improving diagnostic accuracy and providing predictive and prognostic insights.
methodsA comprehensive search for this systematic review was conducted using databases Google, PUBMED (n = 450) and Google Scholar (n = 1067) with the keywords "Artificial Intelligence" AND "cytopathological" and "fine needle aspiration" AND "Deep Learning" AND "Machine Learning" AND "Hematologic Disorders" AND "Lung Cancer" AND "Pap Smear" and "cervical cancer screening" AND "Thyroid Cancer" AND "Breast Cancer" and "Sensitivity" and "Specificity". The search focused on literature reviews and systematic reviews published in English language between 2020 and 2024. PRISMA guidelines were adhered to with studies included and excluded as depicted in a flowchart. 417 results were screened with 34 studies were chosen for this review.
resultsIn the screening of patients with cervical cancer, bone marrow and peripheral blood smears and benign and malignant lesions in the lung, AI-assisted methods, particularly machine learning and deep learning (a subset of machine learning) methods, were applied to cytopathological data. These methods yielded greater diagnostic accuracy, specificity and sensitivity and decreased interobserver variability. Data sets were collected for both training and validation. Human machine combined performance was also found to be comparable to standalone performance in comparison with medical performance as well.
conclusionsThe use of AI in the analysis of cytopathological samples in research and clinical settings is increasing, and the involvement of pathologists in AI workflows is becoming increasingly important.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.