Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39558397›Full record

SynthesisEuropean journal of medical research2024

Artificial intelligence in cytopathological applications for cancer: a review of accuracy and analytic validity.

Priya Hays

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European journal of medical research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Priya HaysHays Documentation Specialists, LLC, 225 Virginia Avenue, 2B, San Mateo, CA, 94402, USA. priya.hays@outlook.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCytopathological examination serves as a tool for diagnosing solid tumors and hematologic malignancies. Artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted methods have been widely discussed in the literature for increasing sensitivity, specificity and accuracy in the diagnosis of cytopathological clinical samples. Many of these tools are also used in clinical practice. There is a growing body of literature describing the role of AI in clinical settings, particularly in improving diagnostic accuracy and providing predictive and prognostic insights.

methodsA comprehensive search for this systematic review was conducted using databases Google, PUBMED (n = 450) and Google Scholar (n = 1067) with the keywords "Artificial Intelligence" AND "cytopathological" and "fine needle aspiration" AND "Deep Learning" AND "Machine Learning" AND "Hematologic Disorders" AND "Lung Cancer" AND "Pap Smear" and "cervical cancer screening" AND "Thyroid Cancer" AND "Breast Cancer" and "Sensitivity" and "Specificity". The search focused on literature reviews and systematic reviews published in English language between 2020 and 2024. PRISMA guidelines were adhered to with studies included and excluded as depicted in a flowchart. 417 results were screened with 34 studies were chosen for this review.

resultsIn the screening of patients with cervical cancer, bone marrow and peripheral blood smears and benign and malignant lesions in the lung, AI-assisted methods, particularly machine learning and deep learning (a subset of machine learning) methods, were applied to cytopathological data. These methods yielded greater diagnostic accuracy, specificity and sensitivity and decreased interobserver variability. Data sets were collected for both training and validation. Human machine combined performance was also found to be comparable to standalone performance in comparison with medical performance as well.

conclusionsThe use of AI in the analysis of cytopathological samples in research and clinical settings is increasing, and the involvement of pathologists in AI workflows is becoming increasingly important.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceNeoplasmsBiopsy, Fine-NeedleDeep LearningHumansMachine LearningArtificial intelligenceBone marrow cytopathologyBreast cancer cytopathologyCervical cancer screeningDeep learningLung cancer cytopathology

Identifiers

PMID39558397
PMCPMC11574989

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.