SynthesisJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2024
Factors predicting composite grafts survivability in patients with fingertip amputations; a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Treatment of Pediatric Fingertip Amputations by Chest and Palm Subcutaneous Pocket Techniques.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFingertip amputation is a commonly encountered injury in emergency settings. Composite grafting is a non-microsurgical alternative maintaining digit length with no donor site morbidities. This meta-analysis was conducted to retrieve factors associated with composite graft survivability among patients with fingertip amputations.
methodsA literature review throughout twelve databases was performed on 24 July 2023. All clinical studies comparing the patients-related, trauma-related, or amputation-related variables among patients with survived and non-survived composite grafting were eligible for meta-analysis. Single-arm studies reported the potential predictors of composite graft survival among patients with fingertip injuries treated with composite grafting were included.
resultsThis review included ten articles with 720 fingertips composite grafting. Of them, 526 grafts survived, with a pooled overall survivability of 72.8%. There was a significant association between younger age (OR 2.31,95%CI 1.10, 4.87, P = 0.03), level of amputation (I) (OR 0.31,95% CI 0.14 to 0.67, P = 0.003), and successful composite grafting. There was no statistically significant (P = 0.449) impact of time to composite grafting on the likelihood of composite graft survivability.
conclusionComposite grafting is a feasible and effective procedure for restoring aesthetically functional digits among patients with traumatically amputated fingertips. The composite graft survived among the majority of the patients, with a more significant survival pattern among younger populations and patients with more distal amputations. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.