Observational studyBMC public health2024
Assessing antimicrobial consumption in public and private sectors within the Costa Rican health system: current status and future directions.
Observational study in BMC public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reassessing antimicrobial resistance governance in Latin America: the case for antimicrobial consumption as the primary metric of implementation success.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Article
- Influence of Seasonality and Pollution on the Presence of Antibiotic Resistance Genes and Potentially Pathogenic Bacteria in a Tropical Urban River.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAntimicrobial resistance is a significant global health threat. Therefore, robust surveillance systems for antimicrobial consumption (AMC) are essential to develop public health strategies. However, Latin American countries, including Costa Rica, face challenges in regularly reporting AMC data. This study aims to estimate and analyse the overall AMC in Costa Rica for 2019.
methodsThis study is a national-level, retrospective, observational, and descriptive analysis of AMC in Costa Rica from 1 January to 31 December 2019. The study followed the World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines for the Surveillance of National AMC. The Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) / Defined Daily Doses (DDD) system was used to analyse types of antimicrobials and DDD per 1000 inhabitants per day (DID). Antimicrobial dispensation data from the Costa Rican Social Security Fund (CCSS) represented the public sector, while the private sector data was sourced from IQVIA. The analysis included data from both inpatient and outpatient sectors.
resultsA total AMC of 14.32 DID, of which 12.75 DID was within the public sector and 4.12 DID was within the private sector. Penicillins had the highest consumption nationally and in the public sector, while macrolides and lincosamides predominate in the private sector. According to the WHO-AWaRe (Access-Watch-Reserve) classification, antibiotics predominantly consumed nationally (74.7%) and in the public (83.0%) sectors are categorized under Access, whereas the private (61.0%) sector predominates the Watch category.
conclusionThis study illustrates the importance of enhancing AMC surveillance by integrating data from both the public and private sectors. The findings indicate an excessive use of "Watch" antimicrobials in the private sector. To address this issue, all sectors and regulatory authorities must play an active and supportive role, in the development of effective, multisectoral policies. The methodology employed in this study is applicable to other Latin American countries, and therefore should be utilized for future analysis AMC in this region.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.