ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2024
Classification of lumbar spine disorders using large language models and MRI segmentation.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence for Clinical Decision Support in Rural Spine Care: A Narrative Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Large Language Models in Spine Surgery : A Narrative Review of Performance Paradox and Clinical Integration Challenges.Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society · 2026Article
- Publicly Accessible Large Language Model Responses to Frequently Asked Questions About Spondylodiscitis: Preliminary Expert Evaluation.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Balancing accuracy and efficiency in lumbar spine image segmentation using multi-scale attention and residual learning.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Insufficient reporting quality in large language model studies in the field of radiology.Insights into imaging · 2026Article
- Can AI write reports like a radiologist? A blinded evaluation of large language model-generated lumbar spine MRI reports.European radiology experimental · 2026Observational
- Revolutionizing spine surgery with emerging AI-FEA integration.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Review
- Clinical Applications, Challenges & Pitfalls, and Recommendations for Large Language Model and Generative AI in Musculoskeletal Imaging.Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology · 2025Review
- Large Language Models in Medical Diagnostics: Scoping Review With Bibliometric Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence in musculoskeletal radiology: practical aspects and latest perspectives.BJR open · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMRI is critical for diagnosing lumbar spine disorders but its complexity challenges diagnostic accuracy. This study proposes a BERT-based large language model (LLM) to enhance precision in classifying lumbar spine disorders through the integration of MRI data, textual reports, and numerical measurements.
methodsThe segmentation quality of MRI data is evaluated using dice coefficients (cut-off: 0.92) and intersection over union (IoU) metrics (cut-off: 0.88) to ensure precise anatomical feature extraction. The CNN extracts key lumbar spine features, such as lumbar lordotic angle (LLA) and disc heights, which are tokenized as direct scalar values representing positional relationships. A data source of 28,065 patients with various disorders, including degenerative disc disease, spinal stenosis, and spondylolisthesis, is used to establish diagnostic standards. These standards are refined through post-CNN processing of MRI texture features. The BERT-based spinal LLM model integrates these CNN-extracted MRI features and numerical values through early fusion layers.
resultsSegmentation analysis illustrate various lumbar spine disorders and their anatomical changes. The model achieved high performance, with all key metrics nearing 0.9, demonstrating its effectiveness in classifying conditions like spondylolisthesis, herniated disc, and spinal stenosis. External validation further confirmed the model's generalizability across different populations. External validation on 514 expert-validated MRI cases further confirms the model's clinical relevance and generalizability. The BERT-based model classifies 61 combinations of lumbar spine disorders.
conclusionsThe BERT-based spinal LLM significantly improves the precision of lumbar spine disorder classification, supporting accurate diagnosis and treatment planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.