ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2024
Development and validation of a spontaneous preterm birth risk prediction algorithm based on maternal bioinformatics: A single-center retrospective study.
Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Machine learning for predictive risk stratification in recurrent miscarriage: a systematic review.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Pooled it
- Machine learning to predict adverse perinatal outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.EClinicalMedicine · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence's Role in Improving Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes: A Scoping Review and Consideration of Ethical Issues.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSpontaneous preterm birth (sPTB) is a primary cause of adverse neonatal outcomes. The objective of this study is to analyze the factors influencing the occurrence of sPTB in pregnant women and to construct and validate a predictive model for sPTB risk based on big data from clinical and laboratory assessments during pregnancy.
methodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 3,082 pregnant women, categorizing those who delivered before 37 weeks of gestation as the sPTB group and those who delivered at or after 37 weeks as the full-term group. The performance of five machine learning models was compared using metrics such as the AUC, accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and precision to identify the optimal predictive model. The top 10 predictive variables were selected based on their significance in disease prediction. The data were then divided into a training set (70%) and a validation set (30%) for validation. External data were also utilized to validate the model's predictive performance.
resultsA total of 24 indicators with significant differences were identified. In terms of predicting the risk of preterm birth, the XGBoost algorithm demonstrated the most outstanding performance, with an AUC
conclusionsAt the time of delivery, ALP, AFP, ALB, HCT, TC, DBP, ALT, PLT, height, and SBP are influential factors for sPTB in pregnant women. The XGBoost algorithm, constructed based on these factors, demonstrated the most outstanding performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.