ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2024
Case characteristics and surgical efficacy in elderly patients over 65 years of age with cervical spinal cord injury without fracture and dislocation: a retrospective study.
Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe outcomes of surgical and conservative treatment in elderly patients with cervical spinal cord injury without fracture and dislocation (CSCIWFD) were evaluated over medium- and long-term follow-up periods and the case characteristics were analysed.
methodsData from 39 elderly patients over 65 years of age with CSCIWFD who were admitted to our hospital between January 2010 and June 2022 were retrospectively analysed. Neurological recovery was assessed using the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) grading criteria and the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score at admission, after surgery, and at the final follow-up. Post-injury imaging data were used to evaluate potential underlying lesions and injury types. In the surgical treatment group, the sagittal and transverse diameters of the cervical spinal canal were measured using magnetic resonance imaging at admission and the final follow-up to effectively assess spinal cord decompression.
resultsAt the final follow-up, the JOA score of the 21 patients who underwent surgical treatment was significantly higher than that of the patients who received conservative treatment (P < 0.001). Additionally, the ASIA grading showed a significant improvement compared to the conservative treatment group (P < 0.003). The sagittal and transverse diameters of the cervical canal in the surgical treatment group were significantly larger at the final follow-up than at admission, indicating surgical decompression (P < 0.001).
conclusionElderly men are the most commonly affected group with CSCIWFD, typically presenting with a history of low-energy trauma. For these patients, active surgical management is recommended following the stress period, assuming their physical condition is suitable. Our results suggest that even in patients with prolonged injury, improvement in neurologic and motor function may be superior to conservative treatment after thorough decompression surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.