Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39558206›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2024

Multi-faceted strategies to advance health equity in colorectal cancer screening in primary care setting: quality improvement project.

Einas Batarseh, Elizabeth Onyechi, Omar Arman, Gregory Gudleski, Jessica L Reynolds, Smita Bakhai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Sociodemographic Determinants of Timely Hip Dysplasia Ultrasound Screening.Journal of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Einas BatarsehDepartment of Medicine, University of Buffalo, the State University of New York of Buffalo, NY, Buffalo, 14203, US.
Elizabeth OnyechiDepartment of Medicine, University of Buffalo, the State University of New York of Buffalo, NY, Buffalo, 14203, US.
Omar ArmanDepartment of Medicine, University of Buffalo, the State University of New York of Buffalo, NY, Buffalo, 14203, US.
Gregory GudleskiDepartment of Medicine, University of Buffalo, the State University of New York of Buffalo, NY, Buffalo, 14203, US.
Jessica L ReynoldsDepartment of Medicine, University of Buffalo, the State University of New York of Buffalo, NY, Buffalo, 14203, US.
Smita BakhaiDepartment of Medicine, University of Buffalo, the State University of New York of Buffalo, NY, Buffalo, 14203, US. sybakhai@buffalo.edu.

Funding

Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) Primary Care and Enhancement Community Prevention and Maternal Health award T34HP42144-0200
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of this quality improvement (QI) project was to increase Colorectal Cancer (CRC) screening in patients ages 50-75 years from a baseline of 27-40% within 12 months in a primary care clinic in limited resource communities.

methodsThe multidisciplinary QI-team applied the Plan-Do-Study-Act method and developed stakeholder analysis, an Ishikawa fish bone diagram, a process flow map, and a driver diagram. Major barriers to suboptimal CRC screening included limited health literacy, language preferences, absence of stool test options, and knowledge gaps among patients and providers. The outcome measure was CRC screening rates, while stool test and colonoscopy completion rates served as process measures. Major interventions included the use of a patient-navigator, leveraging digital health technology to create a novel CRC screening data dashboard, educating patients and providers, patient centered-shared decision making, and creating messages and educational videos in patient's preferred languages. We used monthly run charts and statistical process control charts (SPC) for data analysis.

resultsWe observed a sustainable, steady increase in CRC screening rates from baseline rates of 27.0-40.0% (n = 1304/3271) during the study period and 45.6% (n = 1493/3,271) six months post-study, with median rates of 34.0% in the run chart and mean rates of 43.0% in the SPC chart. Furthermore, we observed an increase in colonoscopy completion rates during the study and six months post-study to 65.0% (n = 411/631) and 72.9% (n = 461/631) respectively, from a baseline rate of 25.0%, with a median of 63.0% in the monthly run chart.

conclusionThe increase in CRC screening rates highlights the effectiveness of addressing barriers such as health literacy, language preferences, and knowledge gaps. This underscores the value of a multifaceted approach and the role of a patient navigator in enhancing preventive, patient-centered care. This project focused on population health and addressing social determinants of health to overcome disparities and improve CRC screening in a primary care setting. Continued emphasis on these strategies is likely to further advance colorectal cancer screening efforts.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerHealth EquityPrimary Health CareQuality ImprovementAgedColonoscopyFemaleHealth LiteracyHumansMaleMiddle AgedColorectal cancer screeningDashboardPrimary care

Identifiers

PMID39558206
PMCPMC11572305

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.