Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39558142›Full record

ArticleCommunications medicine2024

Predicting individual patient and hospital-level discharge using machine learning.

Jia Wei, Jiandong Zhou, Zizheng Zhang, Kevin Yuan, Qingze Gu, Augustine Luk, Andrew J Brent, David A Clifton, A Sarah Walker, David W Eyre

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jia WeiNuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9621-529X
Jiandong ZhouNuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3780-9033
Zizheng ZhangBig Data Institute, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Kevin YuanBig Data Institute, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1283-2712
Qingze GuNuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Augustine LukNuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Andrew J BrentNuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
David A CliftonDepartment of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9848-8555
A Sarah WalkerNuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
David W EyreBig Data Institute, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. david.eyre@bdi.ox.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5095-6367

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAccurately predicting hospital discharge events could help improve patient flow and the efficiency of healthcare delivery. However, using machine learning and diverse electronic health record (EHR) data for this task remains incompletely explored.

methodsWe used EHR data from February-2017 to January-2020 from Oxfordshire, UK to predict hospital discharges in the next 24 h. We fitted separate extreme gradient boosting models for elective and emergency admissions, trained on the first two years of data and tested on the final year of data. We examined individual-level and hospital-level model performance and evaluated the impact of training data size and recency, prediction time, and performance in subgroups.

resultsOur models achieve AUROCs of 0.87 and 0.86, AUPRCs of 0.66 and 0.64, and F1 scores of 0.61 and 0.59 for elective and emergency admissions, respectively. These models outperform a logistic regression model using the same features and are substantially better than a baseline logistic regression model with more limited features. Notably, the relative performance increase from adding additional features is greater than the increase from using a sophisticated model. Aggregating individual probabilities, daily total discharge estimates are accurate with mean absolute errors of 8.9% (elective) and 4.9% (emergency). The most informative predictors include antibiotic prescriptions, medications, and hospital capacity factors. Performance remains robust across patient subgroups and different training strategies, but is lower in patients with longer admissions and those who died in hospital.

conclusionsOur findings highlight the potential of machine learning in optimising hospital patient flow and facilitating patient care and recovery.

Identifiers

PMID39558142
PMCPMC11574281

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.