ArticleCommunications medicine2024
Predicting individual patient and hospital-level discharge using machine learning.
Article in Communications medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence-Generated Discharge Dates and Estimation Accuracy in Hospitalized Patients.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Standard-of-care vs. machine learning-recommended discharge destinations for geriatric surgical inpatients: algorithm development and internal validation.European geriatric medicine · 2026Article
- Explainable and Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence in Cardiology: A Narrative Review of Clinical Applications, Operational Integration, and Future Directions.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- PhenoNMF: A novel multi-layer matrix factorization framework for age-stratified comprehensive phenotypic similarity analysis.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- Smart emergency care: a narrative review of predictive machine learning models.Annals of translational medicine · 2025Review
- Review
- Combining Predictive Models of Mortality and Time-to-Discharge for Improved Outcome Assessment in Intensive Care Units.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Concurrent prediction of in-hospital mortality and length of stay using single-task, multiclass and multitask machine learning.BMJ digital health & AI · 2025Article
- Predicting individual patient and hospital-level discharge using machine learning.Communications medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAccurately predicting hospital discharge events could help improve patient flow and the efficiency of healthcare delivery. However, using machine learning and diverse electronic health record (EHR) data for this task remains incompletely explored.
methodsWe used EHR data from February-2017 to January-2020 from Oxfordshire, UK to predict hospital discharges in the next 24 h. We fitted separate extreme gradient boosting models for elective and emergency admissions, trained on the first two years of data and tested on the final year of data. We examined individual-level and hospital-level model performance and evaluated the impact of training data size and recency, prediction time, and performance in subgroups.
resultsOur models achieve AUROCs of 0.87 and 0.86, AUPRCs of 0.66 and 0.64, and F1 scores of 0.61 and 0.59 for elective and emergency admissions, respectively. These models outperform a logistic regression model using the same features and are substantially better than a baseline logistic regression model with more limited features. Notably, the relative performance increase from adding additional features is greater than the increase from using a sophisticated model. Aggregating individual probabilities, daily total discharge estimates are accurate with mean absolute errors of 8.9% (elective) and 4.9% (emergency). The most informative predictors include antibiotic prescriptions, medications, and hospital capacity factors. Performance remains robust across patient subgroups and different training strategies, but is lower in patients with longer admissions and those who died in hospital.
conclusionsOur findings highlight the potential of machine learning in optimising hospital patient flow and facilitating patient care and recovery.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.