ArticleScientific reports2024
Foot fractures diagnosis using a deep convolutional neural network optimized by extreme learning machine and enhanced snow ablation optimizer.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- The diagnostic accuracy of artificial intelligence in detecting foot and ankle fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2026Pooled it
- Diagnostic performance of X-ray-based deep learning models for detecting ankle and foot fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Skeletal radiology · 2026Pooled it
- In silico augmentation strategies for enhanced machine learning performance in fracture recognition.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Parallel and distributed chimp-optimized LSTM for oil well-log reconstruction in China.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The current investigation proposes a novel hybrid methodology for the diagnosis of the foot fractures. The method uses a combination of deep learning methods and a metaheuristic to provide an efficient model for the diagnosis of the foot fractures problem. the method has been first based on applying some preprocessing steps before using the model for the features extraction and classification of the problem. the main model is based on a pre-trained ZFNet. The final layers of the network have been substituted using an extreme learning machine (ELM) in its entirety. The ELM part also optimized based on a new developed metaheuristic, called enhanced snow ablation optimizer (ESAO), to achieve better results. for validating the effectiveness of the proposed ZFNet/ELM/ESAO-based model, it has been applied to a standard benchmark from Institutional Review Board (IRB) and the findings have been compared to some different high-tech methods, including Decision Tree / K-Nearest Neighbour (DT/KNN), Linear discriminant analysis (LDA), Inception-ResNet Faster R-CNN architecture (FRCNN), Transfer learning‑based ensemble convolutional neural network (TL-ECNN), and combined model containing a convolutional neural network and long short-term memory (DCNN/LSTM). Final results show that using the proposed ZFNet/ELM/ESAO-based can be utilized as an efficient model for the diagnosis of the foot fractures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.