Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39558098›Full record

ArticleNature methods2025

A foundation model for joint segmentation, detection and recognition of biomedical objects across nine modalities.

Theodore Zhao, Yu Gu, Jianwei Yang, Naoto Usuyama, Ho Hin Lee, Sid Kiblawi, Tristan Naumann, Jianfeng Gao, Angela Crabtree, Jacob Abel and 6 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature methods, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Prototype-based AI triage for 3D pathology.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Theodore Zhao *Microsoft Research, Redmond, WA, USA.
Yu Gu *Microsoft Research, Redmond, WA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1704-1744
Jianwei YangMicrosoft Research, Redmond, WA, USA.
Naoto UsuyamaMicrosoft Research, Redmond, WA, USA.
Ho Hin LeeMicrosoft Research, Redmond, WA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7378-2379
Sid KiblawiMicrosoft Research, Redmond, WA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6183-3354
Tristan NaumannMicrosoft Research, Redmond, WA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2150-1747
Jianfeng GaoMicrosoft Research, Redmond, WA, USA.
Angela CrabtreeEarle A. Chiles Research Institute, Providence Cancer Institute, Portland, OR, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6584-8158
Jacob AbelProvidence Genomics, Portland, OR, USA.
Christine Moung-WenProvidence Genomics, Portland, OR, USA.
Brian PieningProvidence Genomics, Portland, OR, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2683-8157
Carlo BifulcoProvidence Genomics, Portland, OR, USA.
Mu WeiMicrosoft Research, Redmond, WA, USA. muhsin.wei@microsoft.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-4119-6490
Hoifung PoonMicrosoft Research, Redmond, WA, USA. hoifung@microsoft.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9067-0918
Sheng WangPaul G. Allen School of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA. swang@cs.washington.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0439-5199

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biomedical image analysis is fundamental for biomedical discovery. Holistic image analysis comprises interdependent subtasks such as segmentation, detection and recognition, which are tackled separately by traditional approaches. Here, we propose BiomedParse, a biomedical foundation model that can jointly conduct segmentation, detection and recognition across nine imaging modalities. This joint learning improves the accuracy for individual tasks and enables new applications such as segmenting all relevant objects in an image through a textual description. To train BiomedParse, we created a large dataset comprising over 6 million triples of image, segmentation mask and textual description by leveraging natural language labels or descriptions accompanying existing datasets. We showed that BiomedParse outperformed existing methods on image segmentation across nine imaging modalities, with larger improvement on objects with irregular shapes. We further showed that BiomedParse can simultaneously segment and label all objects in an image. In summary, BiomedParse is an all-in-one tool for biomedical image analysis on all major image modalities, paving the path for efficient and accurate image-based biomedical discovery.

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedPattern Recognition, AutomatedAlgorithmsHumans

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.