Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39558054›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Contact toxicity of insecticides against rice weevil, Sitophilus oryzae L. and its effect on progeny production.

C N Rajarushi, Suresh M Nebapure, Ankur Biswas, S Rajna, S Subramanian

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

C N RajarushiDivision of Entomology, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, 110012, India.
Suresh M NebapureDivision of Entomology, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, 110012, India. smnebapure@gmail.com.
Ankur BiswasICAR-Indian Agricultural Statistics Research Institute, New Delhi, 110012, India.
S RajnaDivision of Entomology, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, 110012, India.
S SubramanianDivision of Entomology, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, 110012, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Post-harvest losses caused by insect pests, particularly the rice weevil, Sitophilus oryzae, pose a significant challenge in food storage facilities worldwide. To combat this pest, synthetic insecticides and fumigants are widely used. However, effective contact insecticides are scarce. Hence, the present study explored the alternatives by evaluating the contact toxicity of various insecticides against S. oryzae using glass, jute, and floor tiles as surface substrates and further examining the effect on progeny production of promising candidate insecticides. Among the insecticides tested, malathion exhibited the highest toxicity on glass and jute surfaces regardless of the exposure period. On the other hand, spinetoram proved to be the most effective on tile surface with an 8 h exposure period. Among the alternate insecticides (spinosad, spinetoram, chlorfenapyr and lambda-cyhalothrin), spinetoram was most effective with LC

Indexed as

InsecticidesWeevilsAnimalsMalathionNitrilesOryzaPyrethrinsInsecticidesMalathionNitrilesPyrethrinsContact insecticidesExposure surfaceExposure timeLethal concentrationProgeny productionRelative toxicitySitophilus oryzae

Identifiers

PMID39558054
PMCPMC11574040

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.