ArticleScientific reports2024
A real-world disproportionality analysis of FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS) events for avatrombopag.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Efficacy and Safety of Avatrombopag in Patients with Chronic Liver Disease and Thrombocytopenia Undergoing Elective Surgery.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Vitamin B12 Deficiency Associated with Metformin and Proton Pump Inhibitors and Their Combinations: Results from a Disproportionality and Interaction Analysis.Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Acute myocardial infarction induced by avatrombopag: a case report.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Avatrombopag is a next-generation thrombopoietin receptor agonist approved for the treatment of thrombocytopenia in patients with chronic liver disease scheduled to undergo surgery and thrombocytopenia in patients with chronic immune thrombocytopenia. However, realistic data on its post-marketing long-term safety and tolerability in large sample populations are incomplete. The adverse event (AE) reports of avatrombopag were analyzed based on the FAERS database. By extracting large-scale data from the FAERS database, this study used various signal quantification techniques such as reporting odds ratios, proportional reporting ratios, Bayesian confidence propagation neural network, and multi-item gamma Poisson shrinker to calculate and evaluate the ratio and association between avatrombopag and specific AEs. In the FAERS database, data from the second quarter of 2018 to the fourth quarter of 2023 were extracted for this study, a total of 1217 avatrombopag-related AEs reports were included for analysis. Based on four calculation methods, this study identified and 32 preferred terms associated with avatrombopag. Common AEs in the product label such as thrombosis, headache, contusion, petechiae, and gingival bleeding were detected. AEs not mentioned in the product label, such as photopsia and ear discomfort were also detected. The first 30 days after initiation of medication were the most common period for both serious and non-serious AEs. This study demonstrates the common AEs and the potential AEs associated with avatrombopag in real-world practice, which could provide valuable cautionary evidence for clinicians and pharmacists to manage safety issues with avatrombopag.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.