ArticleScientific reports2024
Characterization of the complete chloroplast genome and development of molecular markers of Salix.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The complete chloroplast genome sequence of Typhonium flagelliforme, an anti-cancer medicinal plant: genome structure, comparative and phylogenetic relationship analysis within Araceae.Functional & integrative genomics · 2026Article
- Analysis of chloroplast genomes and SSR classification and identification of Agropyron species and closely related species.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Genome-Wide Identification, Characterization, and Expression Analysis ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Salix, an economically and ecologically multifunctional tree species widely distributed in China, encompasses five ornamental species sequenced in this study, which are highly beneficial for plant phytoremediation due to their ability to absorb heavy metals. This research utilized high-throughput sequencing to acquire chloroplast genome sequences of Salix, analyzing their gene composition and structural characteristics, identifying potential molecular markers, and laying a foundation for Salix identification and resource classification. Chloroplast DNA was extracted from the leaves of Salix argyracea, Salix dasyclados, Salix eriocephala, Salix integra 'Hakuro Nishiki', and Salix suchowensis using an optimized CTAB method. Sequencing was conducted on the Illumina NovaSeq PE150 platform, and bioinformatics tools were employed to compare the structural features and variations within the chloroplast genomes of the Salix. Analysis revealed high similarity among the chloroplast genome sequences of the five Salix species, with a subsequent examination identifying 276, 269, 270, 273, and 273 SSR loci, respectively, along with unique simple repeat sequences in each variety. Comparison of chloroplast genomes across 22 Salix highlighted variations in regions such as matK-trnQ, ndhC-trnV, psbE-petL, rpl36-rps8, and ndhB-rps7, which may serve as valuable molecular markers for willow resource classification studies. In this study, chloroplast genome sequencing and structural analysis of Salix not only enhances the genetic resources of Salix but also forms a critical basis for the development of molecular markers and the exploration of interspecific phylogeny in the genus.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.