ArticleScientific reports2024
Comparison between spectral-domain optical coherence tomography-based and partial coherence interferometry-based biometry.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We compared axial length (AL) measurements using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT)-based and partial coherence interferometry (PCI)-based biometry in eyes with various chorioretinal diseases. Medical records were retrospectively analyzed in 123 eyes from 73 patients who underwent AL measurements using SD-OCT and PCI. AL values were highly consistent by both measurements (ICC = 0.996 in SD-OCT and 0.995 in PCI-based biometry). The mean difference in AL between the two instruments was - 0.09 ± 0.17 mm, which was significant (P < 0.001). There was a strong correlation between the measurements obtained using the two instruments (r = 0.982, P < 0.001). The 95% limits of agreement were - 0.43 to 0.25 mm, and the agreement of AL in the Bland-Altman analysis showed a difference. The difference in measurements was not associated with the difference in central retinal thickness (r = 0.033, P = 0.720). However, the presence of an epiretinal membrane affected the difference in measurements, unlike in other chorioretinal diseases (P = 0.014). SD-OCT-based biometry showed a good correlation with PCI-based biometry in the measurement of AL; however, the mean AL between the two instruments was significantly different. Therefore, AL measurements made using SD-OCT-based and PCI-based biometry are not interchangeable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.