Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39557989›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Generating and evaluating synthetic data in digital pathology through diffusion models.

Matteo Pozzi, Shahryar Noei, Erich Robbi, Luca Cima, Monica Moroni, Enrico Munari, Evelin Torresani, Giuseppe Jurman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Matteo Pozzi *Data Science for Health Unit, Fondazione Bruno Kessler, Via Sommarive 18, Povo, Trento, 38123, Italy.
Shahryar Noei *Data Science for Health Unit, Fondazione Bruno Kessler, Via Sommarive 18, Povo, Trento, 38123, Italy.
Erich RobbiData Science for Health Unit, Fondazione Bruno Kessler, Via Sommarive 18, Povo, Trento, 38123, Italy.
Luca CimaDepartment of Diagnostic and Public Health, Section of Pathology, University and Hospital Trust of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Monica MoroniData Science for Health Unit, Fondazione Bruno Kessler, Via Sommarive 18, Povo, Trento, 38123, Italy.
Enrico MunariDepartment of Diagnostic and Public Health, Section of Pathology, University and Hospital Trust of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Evelin TorresaniPathology Unit, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Santa Chiara Hospital, APSS, Trento, Italy.
Giuseppe JurmanData Science for Health Unit, Fondazione Bruno Kessler, Via Sommarive 18, Povo, Trento, 38123, Italy. giuseppe.jurman@fbk.eu.

Funding

Ministero dell'Istruzione, dell'Università e della Ricerca B53C22006170001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Synthetic data is becoming a valuable tool for computational pathologists, aiding in tasks like data augmentation and addressing data scarcity and privacy. However, its use necessitates careful planning and evaluation to prevent the creation of clinically irrelevant artifacts.This manuscript introduces a comprehensive pipeline for generating and evaluating synthetic pathology data using a diffusion model. The pipeline features a multifaceted evaluation strategy with an integrated explainability procedure, addressing two key aspects of synthetic data use in the medical domain.The evaluation of the generated data employs an ensemble-like approach. The first step includes assessing the similarity between real and synthetic data using established metrics. The second step involves evaluating the usability of the generated images in deep learning models accompanied with explainable AI methods. The final step entails verifying their histopathological realism through questionnaires answered by professional pathologists. We show that each of these evaluation steps are necessary as they provide complementary information on the generated data's quality.The pipeline is demonstrated on the public GTEx dataset of 650 Whole Slide Images (WSIs), including five different tissues. An equal number of tiles from each tissue are generated and their reliability is assessed using the proposed evaluation pipeline, yielding promising results.In summary, the proposed workflow offers a comprehensive solution for generative AI in digital pathology, potentially aiding the community in their transition towards digitalization and data-driven modeling.

Indexed as

Deep LearningHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedPathology, ClinicalReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID39557989
PMCPMC11574254

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.