ArticleScientific reports2024
Performance of the comprehensive nutrition screening index in predicting mortality after cardiac surgery.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Malnutrition is a significant risk factor for postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. The Seoul National University Hospital-Nutrition Screening Index (SNUH-NSI) is an automated screening tool designed to comprehensively assess malnutrition risk. However, its predictive value in patients undergoing cardiac surgery remains unvalidated. This study included adult patients who underwent cardiac surgery at a tertiary teaching hospital between May 2008 and December 2019. Patients were classified as low-, intermediate-, or high-risk for malnutrition based on the SNUH-NSI. The association between malnutrition risk and postoperative cumulative all-cause mortality was evaluated using multivariable Cox regression analysis. The predictive ability of the SNUH-NSI was compared with conventional nutritional indices. Compared to the low-risk group, both the high-risk (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 2.64; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.19-3.19; P < 0.001) and intermediate-risk groups (adjusted HR, 1.54; 95% CI, 1.31-1.82; P < 0.001) demonstrated a significantly elevated risk of cumulative all-cause mortality. The multivariable model incorporating SNUH-NSI demonstrated moderate but superior predictive performance compared to that of other conventional nutritional indices. Preoperative malnutrition assessed by the SNUH-NSI was found to be a significant predictor of mortality following cardiac surgery. Implementing the SNUH-NSI for automated preoperative malnutrition screening could be an efficient and cost-effective approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.