ArticleScientific reports2024
Defining the ideal trajectory into the inner ear in image-guided cochlear implant surgery.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The aim of robot-assisted cochlear implant surgery (RACIS) is to access the inner ear with minimal trauma. High-resolution imaging, empowered with a highly accurate navigation system can enable the planning of a direct keyhole drilling trajectory toward the inner ear. The time has come to (re)define the ideal trajectory into the inner ear with robot-assisted tools that can drill with the highest accuracy. The trajectories of past RACIS procedures were analysed to gain insight into how to calculate the most ideal trajectory and to determine which trajectory parameters influence the course of the procedure. Data-analysis was performed on three groups of previously performed RACIS-procedures. Group 1 included the RACIS-procedures with a round window (RW) approach. Group 2 included the RACIS-procedures with difficulty entering the inner ear. Group 3 included the converted cases to conventional CI surgery due to inadequate intra-operative safety margins. The RW diameter was significantly smaller and its orientation significantly less favourable in group 2 compared to group 1. A smaller surface size and an unfavourable orientation of the RW in relation to the drilling trajectory are thus associated with a more difficult electrode array insertion in RACIS. Both must be taken into account when planning a drilling trajectory into the inner ear.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.