ArticleScientific reports2024
Sagittal alignment to predict efficiency in pulsed radiofrequency for cervical facet joint pain.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07535515 (Comparative Effectiveness of Cervical Zygapophyseal Joint Radiofrequency Versus Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion in Chronic Post-Traumatic Whiplash), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Comparative Effectiveness of Cervical Zygapophyseal Joint Radiofrequency Versus Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion in Chronic Post-Traumatic Whiplash: A Retrospective Cohort Study
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical Outcomes and Factors Associated with Response to Fluoroscopy-Guided Cervical Medial Branch Pulsed Radiofrequency in Chronic Cervical Facet Joint Pain: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Cervical sagittal alignment differences according to scapular rotational posture: A retrospective radiographic study.Medicine · 2026Article
- The Reliability of Biomechanical Mensuration Methods of the Sagittal Cervical Spine in Radiography Used in Clinical Practice: A Systematic Review of the Literature.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Pulsed Versus Conventional Radiofrequency Stimulation in Cervical Facet-Mediated Neck Pain: A Single-Centre Retrospective Cohort Study Outcomes.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Clinical Predictors of Ultrasound-Guided Cervical Medial Branch Pulsed Radiofrequency Outcomes: A Cohort Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Impact of Pulsed Radiotherapy on Pain and Quality of Life in Elderly Postherpetic Neuralgia Patients.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2025Article
- The Rationale and Safety of Routine Imaging in Rehabilitative Spine Care: Delayed Radiographs for Patients Presenting With Spine Disorders is Debatable.Dose-response : a publication of International Hormesis SocietyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neck pain due to cervical facet joint pain has a prevalence of 36-60% in chronic neck pain. Pulsed radiofrequency for such pain has been verified. After proper patient selection, pulsed radiofrequency of the cervical facet joints provide long-term pain relief in a routine clinical setting. In the patient selection, clinical and sagittal alignment parameters are rarely discussed for the outcome. In the present study, we analyzed the factors from the clinical data and sagittal alignment parameters and investigated the associated predictors of pulsed radiofrequency for cervical facet joint pain. There were 204 patients with cervical facet joint pain who received a medial branch block and pulsed radiofrequency between 2015 and 2020 after excluding patients with neurological symptoms and other confounding factors. The patients were classified into good and poor outcome groups based on the improvement of the pain score(visual analog scale). Clinical and radiological data were analyzed. Multivariable logistic model showed that the predictors were cervical lordosis including two methods (odds ratio [OR] 0.92, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.89-0.96 for C2-C7 Cobb angle; OR 0.91, 95% CI: 0.88-0.95 for the angle measured by the Jackson method), ossification of the nuchal ligament, number of diseased facet joints, anterior cervical discectomy with fusion, and adjacent facet joint after anterior cervical discectomy with fusion. With the results, we demonstrated that the outcome were related to cervical lordosis including two methods, formation of ossification of nuchal ligament, the number of diseased facet joints, post anterior cervical discectomy with fusion, and adjacent facet joint post anterior cervical discectomy with fusion. The corresponding optimal cutoff for discriminating a poor outcome was 7° for the C2-C7 Cobb angle and - 2° for the angle measured using the Jackson method.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.