ArticleScientific reports2024
An intelligent emulsion explosive grasping and filling system based on YOLO-SimAM-GRCNN.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- GeoBoreNet: RGB-Geometry Fusion for Cross-Scene Borehole Detection.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
For the blasting scenario, our research develops an emulsion explosive grasping and filling system suitable for tunnel robots. Firstly, we designed a system, YOLO-SimAM-GRCNN, which consists of an inference module and a control module. The inference module primarily consists of a blast hole position detection network based on YOLOv8 and an explosive grasping network based on SimAM-GRCNN. The control module plans and executes the robot's motion control based on the output of the inference module to achieve symmetric grasping and filling operations. Meanwhile, The SimAM-GRCNN grasping network model is utilized to carry out comparative evaluated on the Cornell and Jacquard dataset, achieving a grasping detection accuracy of 98.8% and 95.2%, respectively. In addition, on a self-built emulsion explosive dataset, the grasping detection accuracy reaches 96.4%. The SimAM-GRCNN grasping network model outperforms the original GRCNN by an average of 1.7% in accuracy, achieving a balance between blast holes detection, grasping accuracy and filling speed. Finally, experiments are conducted on the Universal Robots 3 manipulator arm, using distributed deployment and manipulator arm motion control mode to achieve an end-to-end grasping and filling process. On the Jetson Xavier NX development board, the average time consumption is 119.67 s, with average success rates of 87.1% for grasping and 79.2% for filling emulsion explosives.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.