Observational studyInfection2025
Pre-hospital time delays in imported malaria diagnosis in hospitalized sub-Saharan travelers and migrants: not only on the patient's shoulders.
Observational study in Infection, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Presumed Relapse of Plasmodium vivax Malaria Presenting With Thrombocytopenia in a Non-endemic Area: A Case Report.Cureus · 2026Article
- Malaria in Children at 9 US Hospitals: 2016-2023.Pediatrics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo analyze the diagnostic delay in malaria related to misdiagnosis at first medical visit and its association with the risk of severe malaria in non-endemic areas.
methodsRetrospective observational study of sub-Saharan migrants with imported malaria from January-2010 to December-2022. Patients were allocated in two groups depending on if malaria was suspected at first medical visit or not. Time delays in seeking healthcare, medical diagnostic delay (time between first attending a medical facility and the diagnosis of malaria) and total diagnostic delay (time between the onset of symptoms and the diagnosis of malaria) were calculated.
results297 patients were included in the analysis. At first medical visit, malaria was misdiagnosed in 137 patients (46.1%). Medical diagnostic delay and total diagnostic delay were larger for the misdiagnosis group than for those properly diagnosed at first visit (p < 0.001). Although time in seeking healthcare was shorter in the misdiagnosis group, the presence of suggesting symptoms, such as fever, was lower (p < 0.050). Misdiagnosis was more frequent in emergency rooms linked to primary healthcare (p < 0.001). For the overall population (n = 297), total diagnostic delay was mainly due to delay in seeking healthcare. Initial misdiagnosis was associated with a higher risk of severe malaria (adjusted OR 2.23 [1.09-5.10], p = 0.031).
conclusionIn a non-endemic area with a high rate of imported malaria, the percentage of patients misdiagnosed is surprisingly high. Misdiagnosis is associated with longer medical and total diagnostic delays and with a higher risk of severe malaria. It seems necessary to redesign training programs to improve knowledge among healthcare professionals and actions targeted to travelers to promote seeking healthcare advice promptly.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.