ReviewJournal of ultrasound2025
Ceus features of liver pecoma: a case report and literature review.
Review in Journal of ultrasound, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Characteristics and Treatment of Primary Hepatic Perivascular Epithelioid Cell Tumor (PEComa) in Adults: A Systematic Review.Cancers · 2025Review
- Washout on Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound of Benign Focal Liver Lesions-A Review on Its Frequency and Possible Causes.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Perivascular epithelioid cell neoplasms (PEComas) and epithelioid angiomyolipomas (EAMLs) are two different denominations for the same "mesenchymal tumor composed of histologically and immunohistochemically distinctive perivascular epithelioid cells". Hepatic PEComa/EAML is a very rare neoplasm, and only 29 case reports of hepatic PEComa and 25 of hepatic EAML have been reported in the current literature. A clear female predominance with a mean age at diagnosis of 42.5 years old can be observed by literature review. Ultrasound (US) examination was the first-line diagnostic technique in most of the cases of hepatic PEComa, but it was documented in very few cases of hepatic EAML. A great variability in the ultrasonographic B-mode, color Doppler and contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) features of hepatic PEComa/EAML emerges. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance were the most common used techniques to confirm the nature of the hepatic lesion, even if the anatomo-pathological examination was the only technique to display a certainty diagnosis and to differentiate hepatic PEComa/EAML from benign and malignant hepatic lesions. The great majority of hepatic PEComas/EAMLs are surgically treated without any adjuvant therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.