SynthesisJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2025
Assessing the impact of calcium ionophore on pregnancy outcomes in artificial oocyte activation cycles: a 10-year update of systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Insights into The Outcomes of Artificial Oocyte Activation: A Retrospecive Analysis of 1,300 Couples Undergoing Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection.International journal of fertility & sterility · 2026Article
- Artificial activation of clinically failed human oocytes enables euploid blastocyst formation.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2026Article
- Round Spermatid Injection (ROSI) as a Last Resort in High-Risk Azoospermia: Chain of Outcome Metrics and Real-World Safety Signals.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- The efficacy of ionomycin - induced artificial oocyte activation in preventing fertilization failure in an ICSI cycle: an eight - year retrospective study.Journal of ovarian research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe objective is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of calcium ionophore as an artificial oocyte activation (AOA) method on pregnancy outcomes in different groups of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) patients, providing potential evidence to establish consensus on the indications of AOA.
methodsA systematic comprehensive search was performed in Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar databases. Studies published from January 2014 to June 2024 were searched for analysis. All studies that compared ICSI with AOA-ICSI in routine indications composing impaired fertilization or embryo developmental arrest in previous cycles, or male-factor infertility were included.
resultsTwelve studies were included in the meta-analysis. AOA-ICSI was associated with the increase in the overall fertilization rate (OR 1.99, 95% CI 1.16-3.41) and live birth rate (OR 4.58, 95% CI 1.52-13.80). All secondary outcomes including cleavage, blastocyst, high-quality embryo, implantation, biochemical pregnancy, clinical pregnancy presented superiority or equivalence in AOA-ICSI. And the use of calcium ionophore did not increase the miscarriage rate (OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.08-2.43). In subgroup analysis, AOA-ICSI exhibited a more significant effect on patients with indications of no or low fertilization. However, in patients with non-fertilization factors, no statistically significant improvements were observed in all outcomes.
conclusionCalcium ionophore is an effective artificial oocyte activation approach to improving pregnancy outcomes after ICSI, particularly in cases with indications of fertilization factors, providing further support for the application of AOA in specific populations. Further validation is needed to comprehensively establish the safety of AOA.
trial registrationPROSPERO registration number CRD42024551481.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.