ArticleDrug delivery and translational research2025
Optimizing CNC milling parameters for manufacturing of ultra-sharp tip microneedle with various tip angles.
Article in Drug delivery and translational research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advancements and challenges in ophthalmic microneedles to treat eye diseases.Drug delivery · 2026Review
- Evolution of 3D-Printed Microneedles toward Closed-Loop Theranostic Platforms.Research (Washington, D.C.) · 2026Review
- Leveraging Microneedles for Raised Scar Management.Polymers · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Microneedle technology has emerged as an advanced method for transdermal drug delivery, which focuses on diverse fabrication techniques to develop microneedles with various models and geometries. This study explores the application of Computer Numerical Control (CNC) milling technology to create microneedle master molds with extremely sharp tips. We examined the effects of two key machining parameters, feed rate and ramp angle, on the tip sharpness of the microneedles. Our results showed that increasing both the feed rate and ramp angle could significantly reduce machining time. However, a higher feed rate also led to larger tip diameters and notable tip defects. Conversely, changes in the ramp angle at a constant feed rate had minimal impact on tip size. We identified an optimal condition balancing cutting time and tip sharpness at a feed rate of 100 mm/min and a ramp angle of 1.5°. Additionally, we assessed the CNC's capability to produce needles with different tip angles. The findings confirm that needles with varying tip angles maintained tip diameters below 10 μm, with needles having a 50° tip angle exhibiting the sharpest tips at approximately 3.3 μm. Further compression, insertion and diffusion tests were conducted to evaluate the performance of needles with different geometries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39557783What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.