Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39557745›Full record

SynthesisNeurosurgical review2024

Efficacy and safety of deep brain stimulation in drug resistance epilepsy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Amir Reza Bahadori, Parisa Javadnia, Afshan Davari, Mehrdad Sheikhvatan, Sara Ranji, Sajad Shafiee, Abbas Tafakhori

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Neurosurgical review, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Amir Reza BahadoriIranian Center of Neurological Research Neuroscience Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Parisa JavadniaDepartment of Neurosurgery School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Afshan DavariIranian Center of Neurological Research Neuroscience Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Mehrdad SheikhvatanMedical Biology and Genetics Department, Okan University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Sara RanjiIranian Center of Neurological Research Neuroscience Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Sajad ShafieeStereotactic and Functional Neurosurgeon Associate Professor of Neurosurgery, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran.
Abbas TafakhoriIranian Center of Neurological Research Neuroscience Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. a_tafakhori@tums.ac.ir.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9835-0812

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the context of drug-resistant epilepsy, deep brain stimulation (DBS) has received FDA approval. However, there have been reports of potential adverse effects, such as depression and memory impairment associated with DBS.This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to investigate the impact of DBS on the quality of life (QoL), and seizure frequency of patients who had DRE, and assess its potential adverse events. The study followed PRISMA guidelines and thoroughly assessed databases, including Pubmed, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library, up to 31 July. Statistical analysis, fixed effect model analysis, performed by the Comprehensive Meta-analysis software (CMA) version 3.0. Additionally, Cochran's Q test was conducted to determine the statistical heterogeneity. The systematic review encompassed 54 studies, with 38 studies included in the subsequent meta-analysis. The total number of patients included in the studies was 999. The findings indicated a significant decrease in the mean seizure frequency of subjects following DBS (SMD: 0.609, 95% CI: 0.519 to 0.700, p-value < 0.001). Moreover, patients' QoL significantly improved after DBS (SMD: -0.442, 95% CI: -0.576 to -0.308, p-value < 0.001). The hippocampus displayed the most notable effect size among the different DBS targets. Subgroup analysis based on follow-up duration revealed increased DBS efficacy after two years. There are few reports of adverse events, such as insertional-related complications, infection, and neuropsychiatric complications, but the majority of these were temporary and non-fatal. DBS emerged as an effective and safe procedure for reducing seizure frequency and enhancing the quality of life in DRE patients, with minimal adverse events. Furthermore, the efficacy of DBS was observed to improve over time.

Indexed as

Deep Brain StimulationDrug Resistant EpilepsyQuality of LifeHumansTreatment OutcomeAdverse effectsDeep brain stimulationDrug resistant epilepsyQuality of life

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.