ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2025
Multimodality Therapy and Survival Outcomes in Resectable Primary Small Cell Carcinoma of the Esophagus: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.
Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pattern of Lymph Node Metastases and Recurrence in Thoracic Small Cell Esophageal Carcinoma: A Single-Institution Experience.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Esophageal Small Cell Carcinoma: From Bench Discoveries to Bedside Therapeutics.International journal of biological sciences · 2026Review
- Development and validation of a prognostic model for overall survival in small cell carcinoma of the esophagus.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Treatment efficacy of first-line immunotherapy in advanced esophageal small cell carcinoma: A real-world retrospective study.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCurrently, optimal treatment strategy for resectable primary small cell carcinoma of the esophagus (PSmCCE) remains controversial. To address this, we conducted a multicenter study to evaluate treatment patterns and long-term survival of PSmCCE patients who underwent radical resection.
methodsThis retrospective multicenter study included resected PSmCCE patients who received radical resection at seven high-volume cancer centers. Overall survival (OS) and median survival time (MST) were calculated by using a Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test was utilized to assess differences. Multivariable Cox analysis was performed to identify independent prognostic factors.
resultsA total of 352 patients with resected PSmCCE were included. For PSmCCE with stage cT1-2N0M0, patients who received surgery plus adjuvant therapy showed better survival than those who received surgery alone (5-year OS rate: 32.8% vs. 19.2%, MST: 44.0 vs. 33.0 months, P = 0.035). Multivariable Cox survival analysis revealed an independent correlation between receiving surgery plus adjuvant therapy and improved OS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.529; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.280-0.997; P = 0.049). For stage cT3N0M0/T1-3N1M0 PSmCCE, patients who received neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgery had superior long-term survival compared with those who received surgery combined with adjuvant therapy and those who received surgery alone (5-year OS rate: 27.2% vs. 9.5% vs. 0%, MST: 36.0 vs. 24.0 vs. 20.0 months, P = 0.014). Multivariable Cox survival analysis showed that neoadjuvant therapy was independently associated with improved OS (HR 0.384, 95% CI 0.203-0.728; HR 0.550, 95% CI 0.312-0.968; P = 0.013).
conclusionsAdjuvant therapy was associated with improved survival in stage cT1-2N0M0 PSmCCE, but this should be confirmed in prospective studies. For stage cT3N0M0/T1-3N1M0 cases, neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgery should be considered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39557721What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.