Trial reportLasers in medical science2024
Photobiomodulation in recurrent aphthous stomatitis management using three different laser wavelengths. A randomized clinical trial.
Trial report in Lasers in medical science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- An italian multicenter triple-blind randomized controlled trial on photobiomodulation after third molar extraction (BIOSTOTT). A study of italian society for laser in dentistry (SILO).Medicina oral, patologia oral y cirugia bucal · 2026Trial
- Article
- Laser Photobiomodulation: What Are the Ideal Parameters for Each Type of Laser Used in Dental Practice to Promote Fibroblast Proliferation and Differentiation? A Systematic Review.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recurrent aphthous stomatitis (RAS) is a common oral lesion with no definitive treatment; current therapies primarily focus on symptom relief. This study aims to address the lack of high-quality clinical research by evaluating the effectiveness of Photobiomodulation Therapy (PBMT) using GaAlAs 808 nm, AlGaInp 660 nm, and GaAs 635 nm lasers for managing aphthous lesions. The study focuses on the lasers' effectiveness in reducing pain, accelerating healing, enhancing patient satisfaction, and preventing recurrence compared to a control group. A randomized controlled clinical study was conducted with 64 RAS patients, divided into four groups: 808 nm laser, 660 nm laser, 635 nm laser, and a placebo. Pain severity, ulcer size, and erythema were evaluated at various time points before, immediately after, and several days post-treatment, while patient satisfaction and recurrence were assessed after one month. All laser groups significantly reduced pain intensity, ulcer size, and erythema, with the 808 nm laser showing the most pronounced effects. Mean pain scores in the laser groups decreased to zero by day 7, whereas the control group had a slower reduction (p < 0.001). Ulcer size was significantly smaller in the 808 nm group on days 3 and 7 (p < 0.05). Erythema was significantly reduced by day 7 (p < 0.05). The 808 nm laser also resulted in the highest patient satisfaction, with no recurrences observed in any group. PBMT is an effective treatment for RAS, and the 808 nm laser was the most effective wavelength used.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39557704What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.