Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39557652›Full record

ReviewHerzschrittmachertherapie & Elektrophysiologie2024

[Left bundle branch pacing is superior to classic cardiac resynchronisation therapy : Pros and cons].

Sergio Richter, Bernd Lemke

Abstract readReviewComparative StudyEnglish Abstract
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Herzschrittmachertherapie & Elektrophysiologie, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sergio RichterSektion Rhythmologie, Klinik für Innere Medizin und Kardiologie, Herzzentrum Dresden, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstr. 76, 01307, Dresden, Deutschland. sergio.richter@herzzentrum-dresden.com.
Bernd LemkeKlinik für Kardiologie, Elektrophysiologie und Angiologie, Klinikum Lüdenscheid, Märkische Kliniken GmbH, Lüdenscheid, Deutschland. bernd.lemke@rub.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) is an effective method for increasing quality of life and life expectancy for many patients with heart failure. Due to the good results, this procedure is used frequently in Germany and has established itself as a class I indication in heart failure therapy. In addition to His bundle pacing, left bundle branch pacing has now also made a name for itself, as it shows a good success rate and can be used in a wider range of patients. Now the question arises as to whether left bundle branch pacing is superior to classic biventricular pacing and what the evidence situation is in this respect. This question shall be discussed in this article considering current studies and guideline recommendations.

Indexed as

Bundle-Branch BlockCardiac Resynchronization TherapyEvidence-Based MedicineHeart FailureHumansTreatment OutcomeBiventricular pacingCardiac resynchronization therapyConduction system pacingEvidenceHeart failure

Identifiers

PMID39557652

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.