Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39557420›Full record

ArticleStatistics in medicine2024

Improving Survey Inference Using Administrative Records Without Releasing Individual-Level Continuous Data.

Sharifa Z Williams, Jungang Zou, Yutao Liu, Yajuan Si, Sandro Galea, Qixuan Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistics in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sharifa Z WilliamsDepartment of Biostatistics, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9140-1314
Jungang ZouDepartment of Biostatistics, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5221-1489
Yutao LiuDepartment of Biostatistics, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2600-5454
Yajuan SiInstitute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8707-7374
Sandro GaleaSchool of Public Health, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Qixuan ChenDepartment of Biostatistics, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.

Funding

Longitudinal Effects of Socioeconomic Disadvantage and Racial Discrimination on Health Among African Americans and Puerto RicansR01MD012248 · NIMHD · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI PAHL, KERSTIN · 2017 to 2021
$4.3M
Statistical adjustments of sample representation in community-level estimates of COVID-19 transmission and immunityU01MD017867 · NIMHD · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI SI, YAJUAN · 2022 to 2025
$2.2M
Improving the analysis and use of contaminated immunoassays: from methods development to implementationR01ES035784 · NIEHS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Qixuan Chen, ANDREW GELMAN · 2024 to 2026
$1.2M
Software development for Stan to improve survey statistics for non-probability samplesR01AG067149 · NIA · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI GELMAN, ANDREW · 2020 to 2022
$967k
Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University Initiative for Maximizing Student DiversityNational Science Foundation SES2217456NIA NIH HHS R01 AG067149NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES035784NIH HHS R01AG067149NIH HHS R01ES035784NIH HHS R01MD12248NIH HHS U01MD017867NIMHD NIH HHS R01 MD012248NIMHD NIH HHS U01 MD017867
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Probability surveys are challenged by increasing nonresponse rates, resulting in biased statistical inference. Auxiliary information about populations can be used to reduce bias in estimation. Often continuous auxiliary variables in administrative records are first discretized before releasing to the public to avoid confidentiality breaches. This may weaken the utility of the administrative records in improving survey estimates, particularly when there is a strong relationship between continuous auxiliary information and the survey outcome. In this paper, we propose a two-step strategy, where the confidential continuous auxiliary data in the population are first utilized to estimate the response propensity score of the survey sample by statistical agencies, which is then included in a modified population data for data users. In the second step, data users who do not have access to confidential continuous auxiliary data conduct predictive survey inference by including discretized continuous variables and the propensity score as predictors using splines in a Bayesian model. We show by simulation that the proposed method performs well, yielding more efficient estimates of population means with 95% credible intervals providing better coverage than alternative approaches. We illustrate the proposed method using the Ohio Army National Guard Mental Health Initiative (OHARNG-MHI). The methods developed in this work are readily available in the R package AuxSurvey.

Indexed as

Bayes TheoremPropensity ScoreBiasComputer SimulationConfidentialityData Interpretation, StatisticalHumansModels, StatisticalOhioSurveys and QuestionnairesBayesian predictive inferencecontinuous auxiliary variablesgeneralized additive modelinclusion propensitypoststratificationRstan

Identifiers

PMID39557420
PMCPMC11639655

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.