ArticleVox sanguinis2025
Coagulation assay results at birth in preterm infants: A cohort study highlighting the relevance of local reference values for interpretation.
Article in Vox sanguinis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesRoutine coagulation screens at birth are still standard in some European neonatal intensive care units (NICUs), although interpretation of these results is complex in preterm infants. It is unclear to what extent local coagulation assay results agree with published reference ranges when using different analysers and reagents. We aimed to assess coagulation assay results on day 1 of life in very preterm infants admitted to the NICU. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe included all preterm infants born below 32 weeks gestational age (GA) admitted to the Leiden University Medical Center between 2004 and 2020 in whom coagulation assays (prothrombin time [PT] and activated partial thromboplastin time [APTT]) were obtained during the first 24 h of life. Infants either diagnosed with major intraventricular haemorrhage or who received plasma transfusion before coagulation assay were excluded. We assessed coagulation assay results and compared the results between <28 weeks (extremely preterm) and 28-32 weeks (very preterm) GA groups.
resultsCoagulation assays were obtained at birth in 144 infants (144/2577; 5.5%) of whom 104 fulfilled the inclusion criteria. We found similar median PT and APTT values for extremely and very preterm infants (PT: 18.1 vs. 18.7 s [p-value = 0.400]; APTT: 44.2 vs. 47.7 s [p-value = 0.252], respectively).
conclusionWe found similar coagulation assay results at birth for extremely and very preterm infants; however, results deviated considerably from some of the published reference ranges. This may be due to differences between analysers and reagents, underlining the need for reference ranges calibrated to the equipment used per NICU.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.