ArticleThe Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery2025
Multi-institutional model to predict intensive care unit length of stay after cardiac surgery.
Article in The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predictors of Prolonged ICU Stay After Isolated CABG: The Role of MiECC.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Development and external validation of an interpretable machine learning model for predicting prolonged postoperative ICU length of stay in coronary artery bypass grafting patients using MIMIC-IV 3.1 and eICU-CRD 2.0.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- Development and internal validation of a nomogram for predicting prolonged ICU length of stay after oral free flap reconstruction without prophylactic tracheostomy.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Machine learning-based analysis of factors influencing surgical duration in type A aortic dissection.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveIntensive care unit length of stay (ICU LOS) accounts for a large percentage of inpatient cost after cardiac surgery. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons risk calculator predicts total LOS but does not discriminate between ICU and non-ICU time. We sought to develop a predictive model of prolonged ICU LOS.
methodsAdult patients undergoing Society of Thoracic Surgeons index operations within a regional collaborative (2014-2021) were included. Prolonged ICU LOS was defined as ICU care for ≥72 hours postoperatively. A logistic regression model was used to develop a prediction model for the prolonged ICU LOS with prespecified risk factors identified from our previous single-center study. Internal prediction model validation was determined by bootstrapping resampling method. The prediction model performance was assessed by measures of discrimination and calibration.
resultsWe identified 37,519 patients that met inclusion criteria with 11,801 (31.5%) patients experiencing prolonged ICU stay. From the logistic regression model, there were significant associations between prolonged ICU LOS and all pre-specified factors except sleep apnea (all P < .05). Model for End-Stage Liver Disease, preoperative intra-aortic balloon pump use, and procedure types were the most significant predictors of prolonged ICU LOS (all P < .0001). Our prediction model had not only a good discrimination power (bootstrapped-corrected C-index = 0.71) but also excellent calibration (bootstrapped-corrected mean absolute error = 0.005).
conclusionsProlonged ICU stay after cardiac surgery can be predicted with good predictive accuracy using preoperative data and may aid in patient counseling and resource allocation. Through use of a state-wide database, the application of this model may extend to other practices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.