Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39557076›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Directors Association2025

Knowledge and Attitudes toward New Disease-Modifying Treatments for Alzheimer's Disease among Nursing Home Directors.

Shiwei Liang, Brian R Ott, Jennifer Tjia, Kate L Lapane, Alison C Rataj, Matthew Alcusky

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Shiwei LiangDepartment of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA.
Brian R OttDepartment of Neurology, Brown University Warren Alpert Medical School, Providence, RI, USA.
Jennifer TjiaDepartment of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA.
Kate L LapaneDepartment of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA.
Alison C RatajDepartment of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA.
Matthew AlcuskyDepartment of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA. Electronic address: matthew.alcusky@umassmed.edu.

Funding

Antidementia medication use, safety, and effectiveness among nursing home residents with Alzheimer's diseaseR01AG068450 · NIA · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI ALCUSKY, MATTHEW · 2020 to 2022
$2.3M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG068450
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesNursing home (NH) administrator perceptions regarding the utility of Alzheimer's disease (AD) disease-modifying medications in NHs are important because many short and long-stay residents have mild AD. This study examined the interest of directors of nursing (DoNs) in using new AD disease-modifying treatments, changes in attitudes based on differences in costs to the NH, and characteristics (DoN and NH) associated with such changes.

designThis is a cross-sectional study. SETTING AND

participantsThis study is based on a 2022 nationally representative survey of 340 NH DoNs, which was drawn from a stratified random sample of US NHs with ≥30 beds and with a 26.6% response rate.

methodsWe conducted a descriptive analysis to assess the awareness of new AD disease-modifying treatments and the support for their use. We applied logistic regression models to explore the associations between the interest of the DoN in using these new AD treatments and various characteristics.

resultsMost (86%) DoNs stated that they would at least sometimes support the usage of a new disease-modifying medication if there were no NH costs. This percentage was lower if the NH costs per resident were $2000 per year (51.3%) and $20,000 per year (14%). NHs with moderate shares of dual-eligible residents were more sensitive to cost. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Our findings indicated that the interest of DoNs in using disease-modifying treatments for dementia varies widely according to the cost to the NHs. The uptake of new AD medications in the NH setting should be monitored, and targeted efforts may be needed to mitigate inequities in access for less-resourced NHs.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseNursing HomesCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMaleNurse AdministratorsSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited StatesAlzheimer's diseaseanti-amyloid therapiesantidementia medicationdirector of nursingmild cognitive impairmentNursing home

Identifiers

PMID39557076
PMCPMC12166906

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.