ReviewNature2025
Geological Net Zero and the need for disaggregated accounting for carbon sinks.
Review in Nature, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Fixing carbon credits requires a new financing model.PNAS nexus · 2026Article
- Tracking country-level mitigation progress using NGHGI-consistent carbon budgets.Nature communications · 2026Article
- How much of the forest sink is passive? Case of the United States.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- Carbon sequestration for geological negative emissions of the shale gas value chain in China.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Carbon dioxide removals by tropical moist forests offset most land-use emissions across 18 Afrotropical countries.Communications earth & environment · 2026Article
- Temporary carbon dioxide removals to offset methane emissions.Nature climate change · 2026Article
- Article
- A global dataset for steel aluminum and cement in-use stocks at 500 m gridded level 2000-2019.Scientific data · 2025Article
- From global to national GHG budgets: the REgional Carbon Cycle Assessment and Processes-3 (RECCAP3).National science review · 2025Article
- Mitigating anthropogenic climate change with aqueous green energy.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
25 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Achieving net-zero global emissions of carbon dioxide (CO
Identifiers
39557072What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.