Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39556969›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of medical informatics2025

Electronic health records and data exchange in the WHO European region: A subregional analysis of achievements, challenges, and prospects.

Roberto Tornero Costa, Keyrellous Adib, Nagui Salama, Stefania Davia, Antonio Martínez Millana, Vicente Traver, Karapet Davtyan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of medical informatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Monitoring and evaluation instruments of individual health in community settings: a scoping review.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Clinical research in private hospitals: a perspective.Journal of translational medicine · 2026
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Roberto Tornero CostaInstituto Universitario de Investigación de Aplicaciones de las Tecnologías de la Información y de las Comunicaciones Avanzadas, Universitat Politècnica de València, Valencia, Spain.
Keyrellous AdibWorld Health Organization Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Nagui SalamaWorld Health Organization Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Stefania DaviaWorld Health Organization Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Antonio Martínez MillanaInstituto Universitario de Investigación de Aplicaciones de las Tecnologías de la Información y de las Comunicaciones Avanzadas, Universitat Politècnica de València, Valencia, Spain.
Vicente TraverInstituto Universitario de Investigación de Aplicaciones de las Tecnologías de la Información y de las Comunicaciones Avanzadas, Universitat Politècnica de València, Valencia, Spain.
Karapet DavtyanWorld Health Organization Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen, Denmark. Electronic address: kdavtyan@who.int.

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electronic health record (EHR) systems are powerful tools that enhance healthcare quality. They improve efficiency, enable data exchange, and ensure authorized access to patient information. In 2022, the World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe (WHO EURO) conducted a survey to assess the digital health capabilities of the 53 Member States. This article provides a sub-regional analysis of the status of EHR systems and major barriers to their implementation, their readiness for information sharing, and the access and re-use of EHR data. Generally, EHR implementation and national data exchange are at an advanced stage in the region, though achievements and challenges vary across subregions. While more Member States in the Eastern, Western, and Southern Europe subregions reported having centralized national EHR systems, the situation is more diverse in Northern Europe and the Asian subregions, where both centralized and decentralized EHR systems are in use. Significant barriers to EHR implementation, including funding, technical capacity, competing priorities, and lack of interoperability standards are frequently cited, while others like demand, knowledge or acceptance challenges are not reported as significant. Significant barriers were reported the most by the Central Asia subregion, while barriers had least significance in Western Europe. Five out of the six subregions reported a wide adoption of national strategies and have dedicated agencies to ensure interoperability and secure data exchange. However, only 29 Member States have established legal requirements for healthcare providers to adopt EHR systems that conform to national standards for both clinical terminology and electronic messaging, with this being most notable in Western, Eastern, and Northern Europe, and the lowest percentage of Member States in Central Asia. All Member States of the six sub regions have passed privacy and data protection legislation. The use of EHR data is widely regulated, with only five remaining Member States of WHO Europe to develop EHR legislation distributed across subregions (Southern Europe, Western and Central Asia). Looking ahead, Member States are encouraged to define national legislation governing EHR systems and their use, while ensuring the interconnectivity of the local and regional EHR systems. Sustainable funding should be allocated to the development and maintenance of these systems. Efforts should also focus on creating comprehensive roadmaps for the full implementation of health data standards, addressing interoperability at local and regional levels, and developing quality management systems for testing and certification. Additionally, monitoring and evaluation should be conducted to assess whether EHRs are contributing to national health objectives. Finally, engaging patients and intersectoral partners will be key to developing a more patient-centered approach, ensuring that EHR systems meet patient needs and expectations.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsWorld Health OrganizationEuropeHealth Information ExchangeHealth Information InteroperabilityHumansInformation DisseminationDigital healthElectronic Health RecordsInteroperabilityStandards

Identifiers

PMID39556969
PMCPMC11635092

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.