ArticleJournal of neurosurgery. Case lessons2024
Perioperative management of patients with glioblastoma copresenting with pheochromocytoma: illustrative case.
Article in Journal of neurosurgery. Case lessons, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundUndiagnosed pheochromocytoma can present with hemodynamic instability during surgical procedures. Here, the authors discuss a 69-year-old male with isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)-wildtype glioblastoma copresenting with undiagnosed pheochromocytoma, which, to the authors' knowledge, is the second reported case in the literature. OBSERVATIONS: The patient presented to the emergency department with a 1-month history of coordination difficulties, progressive morning headache, and mild left-side weakness. Imaging showed a 5-cm peripherally enhancing intra-axial right parietal mass with surrounding vasogenic edema. Intraoperatively, the patient had significant uncontrollable hypertension up to 240/120 mm Hg, and the operation was promptly aborted. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography imaging of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis identified a 4.9-cm left adrenal mass of indeterminant etiology. Endocrinology diagnosed the incidentaloma as a pheochromocytoma, initiating alpha blockade followed by beta blockade, and the urology service performed a laparoscopic adrenalectomy after patient stabilization. The neurosurgery service removed the intra-axial brain lesion 2 days after adrenalectomy, which was diagnosed as IDH-wildtype glioblastoma. The patient was discharged home after 6 days in stable condition. LESSONS: This case highlights the importance of preoperative screening for pheochromocytoma in neurosurgical patients with adrenal incidentalomas, especially in incidentalomas > 4 cm, even without high clinical suspicion. https://thejns.org/doi/10.3171/CASE24374.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.