ArticleJournal of neurosurgery. Case lessons2024
Endovascular removal of a symptomatic intracranial foreign body via contact aspiration: illustrative case.
Article in Journal of neurosurgery. Case lessons, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWith the growing utilization of general endovascular techniques, iatrogenic endovascular foreign bodies have become more prevalent. Contact aspiration has proven to be a valuable technique in treating ischemic strokes by removing the intraluminal thrombus causing cerebral perfusion deficits and neurological symptoms. The authors present a case of the removal of a foreign body from the vasculature via contact aspiration, which had embolized in a delayed fashion after aortic valve replacement. OBSERVATIONS: A 54-year-old male developed intermittent left-sided weakness 8 days after aortic valve replacement. A head computed tomography scan showed a metallic foreign body within the origin of the M2 superior division of the middle cerebral artery suspected to be a migrated Cor-Knot fastener. During angiography, the foreign body was repositioned and removed via contact aspiration. Postprocedurally, magnetic resonance imaging scans showed a small area of diffusion restriction in the right basal ganglia. The patient was neurologically intact and was discharged on postprocedure day 2 without further neurological sequelae. LESSONS: Contact aspiration is a safe and effective technique to remove foreign bodies from the intracranial circulation; however, it requires a quality interface between the aspiration catheter and the foreign body throughout the aspiration process. https://thejns.org/doi/10.3171/CASE24376.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.