Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39556725›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2024

Ecology and life history predict avian nest success in the global tropics.

Zachariah Fox Smart, Philip A Downing, Suzanne H Austin, Harold F Greeney, Gustavo A Londoño, Mominul I Nahid, W Douglas Robinson, Christina Riehl

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Nest Predators and Reproductive Success in the Chinese Francolin (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Zachariah Fox Smart *Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544.ORCID 0000-0003-2690-2910
Philip A Downing *Faculty of Science, Ecology and Genetics Research Unit, University of Oulu, Oulu FI-90014, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-5286-3153
Suzanne H AustinDepartment of Fisheries, Wildlife and Conservation Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97330.ORCID 0000-0002-6925-1807
Harold F GreeneyYanayacu Biological Station & Center for Creative Studies, Cosanga, Napo 150204, Ecuador.
Gustavo A LondoñoDepartamento de Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad Icesi, Facultad de Ingeniería, Diseño y Ciencias Aplicadas, Cali AA25608, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0003-1896-8653
Mominul I NahidMangrove Silviculture Division, Bangladesh Forest Research Institute, Sholashahar, Chittagong 4000, Bangladesh.
W Douglas RobinsonDepartment of Fisheries, Wildlife and Conservation Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97330.ORCID 0000-0003-2240-0606
Christina RiehlDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544.ORCID 0000-0002-7872-336X

Funding

NSF DEB-1120682NSF IBN-0212587NSF IOS-1755279NSF IOS-1845431
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nest predation rates critically influence avian biodiversity and evolution. In the north temperate zone, increased nest failure along edges of forest fragments is hypothesized to play a major role in the disappearance of bird species from disturbed landscapes. However, we lack comprehensive syntheses from tropical latitudes, where biodiversity is highest and increasingly threatened by habitat fragmentation and disturbance. We assembled data from five decades of field studies across the global tropics (1,112 populations of 661 species) and used phylogenetic models to evaluate proposed predictors of nest success. We found significant effects of several traits, including adult body mass and nest architecture. Contrary to results from many temperate locations, anthropogenic habitat disruption did not consistently reduce nest success; in fact, raw nest success rates were lower in large tracts of primary forest than in disturbed or fragmented landscapes. Follow-up analyses within species, using a subset of 76 species for which we had estimates of nest survival in habitats with different levels of disruption, confirmed that neither disturbance nor fragmentation significantly influenced nest success. These results suggest that nest predation alone cannot explain observed declines in avian biodiversity in tropical forest fragments, raising new questions about the demographic processes that drive extinction in the tropics.

Indexed as

BiodiversityBirdsNesting BehaviorTropical ClimateAnimalsEcosystemForestsPhylogenyPredatory Behavioravian demographyforest fragmentationnest survivalreproductive successtropical biology

Identifiers

PMID39556725
PMCPMC11621757

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.